Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS cash flow-to-debt ratio. Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (PRKME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL4.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL725.06 Million) in one year. Check Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi v (PRKME) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS across 23 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi v to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi v generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | TL134.76 Million | TL725.06 Million | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2024 | 0.65x | TL391.41 Million | TL606.06 Million | ▲ +6468.5% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | TL4.67 Million | TL474.72 Million | ▼ -91.6% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | TL26.76 Million | TL228.93 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | TL14.38 Million | TL146.26 Million | ▲ +126.1% |
| 2020 | -0.38x | TL-29.93 Million | TL79.60 Million | ▼ -487.1% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | TL-4.83 Million | TL75.42 Million | ▲ +93.0% |
| 2018 | -0.91x | TL-38.25 Million | TL42.05 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2017 | -3.65x | TL-171.62 Million | TL47.04 Million | ▼ -214.2% |
| 2016 | 3.19x | TL199.97 Million | TL62.60 Million | ▲ +139.9% |
| 2015 | 1.33x | TL123.63 Million | TL92.82 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2014 | 2.63x | TL143.72 Million | TL54.59 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2012 | 4.57x | TL241.19 Million | TL52.80 Million | ▲ +279.4% |
| 2011 | 1.20x | TL48.94 Million | TL40.65 Million | ▲ +207.9% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | TL12.91 Million | TL33.01 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2009 | 0.72x | TL21.54 Million | TL29.97 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2007 | 0.66x | TL35.14 Million | TL53.06 Million | ▼ -87.8% |
| 2005 | 5.43x | TL75.13 Million | TL13.85 Million | ▲ +1462.5% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | TL2.75 Million | TL7.91 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | TL2.81 Million | TL16.28 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 2002 | 1.19x | TL17.95 Trillion | TL15.14 Trillion | ▲ +1417.3% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | TL1.60 Trillion | TL20.44 Trillion | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | TL5.77 Trillion | TL17.33 Trillion | — |