Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (PRKME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (PRKME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL4.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL725.06 Million) in one year. See PRKME free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS across 23 annual periods. Also explore Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi v (PRKME) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Park Elektrik Uretim Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PRKME company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | TL134.76 Million | TL725.06 Million | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2024 | 0.65x | TL391.41 Million | TL606.06 Million | ▲ +6468.5% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | TL4.67 Million | TL474.72 Million | ▼ -91.6% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | TL26.76 Million | TL228.93 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | TL14.38 Million | TL146.26 Million | ▲ +126.1% |
| 2020 | -0.38x | TL-29.93 Million | TL79.60 Million | ▼ -487.1% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | TL-4.83 Million | TL75.42 Million | ▲ +93.0% |
| 2018 | -0.91x | TL-38.25 Million | TL42.05 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2017 | -3.65x | TL-171.62 Million | TL47.04 Million | ▼ -214.2% |
| 2016 | 3.19x | TL199.97 Million | TL62.60 Million | ▲ +139.9% |
| 2015 | 1.33x | TL123.63 Million | TL92.82 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2014 | 2.63x | TL143.72 Million | TL54.59 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2012 | 4.57x | TL241.19 Million | TL52.80 Million | ▲ +279.4% |
| 2011 | 1.20x | TL48.94 Million | TL40.65 Million | ▲ +207.9% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | TL12.91 Million | TL33.01 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2009 | 0.72x | TL21.54 Million | TL29.97 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2007 | 0.66x | TL35.14 Million | TL53.06 Million | ▼ -87.8% |
| 2005 | 5.43x | TL75.13 Million | TL13.85 Million | ▲ +1462.5% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | TL2.75 Million | TL7.91 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | TL2.81 Million | TL16.28 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 2002 | 1.19x | TL17.95 Trillion | TL15.14 Trillion | ▲ +1417.3% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | TL1.60 Trillion | TL20.44 Trillion | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | TL5.77 Trillion | TL17.33 Trillion | — |