Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS cash flow-to-debt ratio. Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS (TTRAK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of TL1.50 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL23.35 Billion) in one year. Check TTRAK cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS (2003–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS from 2003 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS across 20 annual periods. Check Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS (TTRAK) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2025)
Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Turk Traktor ve Ziraat Makineleri AS (TTRAK) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | TL6.23 Billion | TL22.89 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2024 | 0.33x | TL6.22 Billion | TL18.97 Billion | ▼ -60.8% |
| 2023 | 0.84x | TL14.27 Billion | TL17.06 Billion | ▲ +194.7% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | TL2.88 Billion | TL10.16 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | TL886.05 Million | TL4.06 Billion | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2020 | 0.51x | TL1.60 Billion | TL3.15 Billion | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2019 | 0.49x | TL1.06 Billion | TL2.15 Billion | ▲ +1046.1% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | TL104.85 Million | TL2.44 Billion | ▼ -84.5% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | TL561.54 Million | TL2.03 Billion | ▲ +85.0% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | TL239.54 Million | TL1.60 Billion | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | TL424.65 Million | TL1.37 Billion | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | TL284.13 Million | TL1.21 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | TL173.56 Million | TL751.29 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | TL286.76 Million | TL655.95 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | TL159.19 Million | TL644.37 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | TL222.04 Million | TL412.51 Million | ▲ +65.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | TL41.85 Million | TL128.77 Million | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2006 | 1.51x | TL122.37 Million | TL80.83 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2005 | 2.52x | TL222.20 Million | TL88.09 Million | ▲ +1045.3% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | TL35.11 Million | TL159.39 Million | — |