Gowa Makassar Tourism Develop (GMTD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.03x

Gowa Makassar Tourism Develop (GMTD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Rp-13.90 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Rp545.29 Billion) in one year. See Gowa Makassar Tourism Develop (GMTD) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Rp-13.90 Billion
IDR

Total Liabilities

Rp545.29 Billion
IDR

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Gowa Makassar Tourism Develop Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Gowa Makassar Tourism Develop across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GMTD cash flow metrics.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gowa Makassar Tourism Develop (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gowa Makassar Tourism Develop. Check GMTD operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (IDR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.03x Rp16.73 Billion Rp545.29 Billion ▼ -82.0%
2024 0.17x Rp78.78 Billion Rp463.19 Billion ▲ +114.7%
2023 0.08x Rp40.21 Billion Rp507.65 Billion ▲ +423.4%
2022 0.02x Rp9.00 Billion Rp594.50 Billion ▼ -88.9%
2021 0.14x Rp70.42 Billion Rp515.86 Billion ▲ +2618.3%
2020 0.01x Rp2.02 Billion Rp402.38 Billion ▼ -64.7%
2019 0.01x Rp5.94 Billion Rp417.35 Billion ▼ -11.4%
2018 0.02x Rp7.85 Billion Rp488.79 Billion ▲ +361.2%
2017 0.00x Rp1.88 Billion Rp538.88 Billion ▲ +106.0%
2016 -0.06x Rp-34.50 Billion Rp590.41 Billion ▲ +42.1%
2015 -0.10x Rp-72.58 Billion Rp719.73 Billion ▼ -316.0%
2014 0.05x Rp40.07 Billion Rp857.97 Billion ▲ +109.1%
2013 -0.51x Rp-462.94 Billion Rp904.42 Billion ▼ -233.3%
2012 0.38x Rp255.95 Billion Rp666.64 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.