Hanson International Tbk (MYRX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2019: 0.04x

Hanson International Tbk (MYRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2019, meaning its operating cash flow of Rp156.63 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Rp4.40 Trillion) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Hanson International Tbk to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Rp156.63 Billion
IDR

Total Liabilities

Rp4.40 Trillion
IDR

Data as of

Sep 2019
Most recent filing

Hanson International Tbk Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2003–2018)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Hanson International Tbk across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Hanson International Tbk.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hanson International Tbk (2003–2018)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hanson International Tbk. Check earnings quality score of Hanson International Tbk to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (IDR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2018 0.03x Rp125.57 Billion Rp3.70 Trillion ▲ +189.5%
2017 -0.04x Rp-115.54 Billion Rp3.05 Trillion ▼ -116.1%
2016 0.24x Rp564.55 Billion Rp2.40 Trillion ▲ +4371.5%
2015 -0.01x Rp-10.90 Billion Rp1.98 Trillion ▲ +97.6%
2014 -0.23x Rp-198.47 Billion Rp861.81 Billion ▼ -345.7%
2013 -0.05x Rp-23.50 Billion Rp454.79 Billion ▼ -176.3%
2012 0.07x Rp58.42 Billion Rp862.95 Billion ▼ -36.2%
2011 0.11x Rp94.97 Billion Rp895.06 Billion ▲ +82.5%
2010 0.06x Rp14.24 Billion Rp245.01 Billion ▼ -40.5%
2007 0.10x Rp42.53 Billion Rp435.49 Billion ▼ -58.8%
2006 0.24x Rp104.96 Billion Rp442.81 Billion ▼ -0.4%
2005 0.24x Rp103.45 Billion Rp434.54 Billion ▲ +169.6%
2004 0.09x Rp33.58 Billion Rp380.34 Billion ▲ +26.8%
2003 0.07x Rp22.16 Billion Rp318.19 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.