Clientele Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Clientele cash flow-to-debt ratio. Clientele (CLI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ZAC-346.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ZAC14.17 Billion) in one year. Check CLI cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Clientele (2003–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Clientele from 2003 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Clientele across 23 annual periods. Check CLI total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Clientele Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2025)
Clientele cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Clientele. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Clientele operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (ZAC) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | ZAC413.39 Million | ZAC14.17 Billion | ▼ -48.7% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | ZAC456.00 Million | ZAC8.01 Billion | ▲ +394.7% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | ZAC-212.28 Million | ZAC10.98 Billion | ▼ -249.6% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | ZAC120.59 Million | ZAC9.34 Billion | ▲ +191.5% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | ZAC38.35 Million | ZAC8.65 Billion | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | ZAC310.55 Million | ZAC8.68 Billion | ▲ +426.4% |
| 2019 | -0.01x | ZAC-89.06 Million | ZAC8.13 Billion | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | ZAC200.48 Million | ZAC3.59 Billion | ▲ +206.2% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | ZAC41.50 Million | ZAC2.28 Billion | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | ZAC73.06 Million | ZAC2.05 Billion | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | ZAC128.72 Million | ZAC2.01 Billion | ▲ +163.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | ZAC49.24 Million | ZAC2.03 Billion | ▲ +108.7% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | ZAC28.23 Million | ZAC2.43 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | ZAC72.97 Million | ZAC2.51 Billion | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | ZAC90.50 Million | ZAC2.15 Billion | ▲ +1665.8% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | ZAC4.06 Million | ZAC1.70 Billion | ▲ +103.7% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | ZAC-98.85 Million | ZAC1.53 Billion | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | ZAC182.52 Million | ZAC1.28 Billion | ▲ +195.5% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | ZAC53.42 Million | ZAC1.10 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | ZAC37.89 Million | ZAC917.63 Million | ▼ -99.4% |
| 2005 | 6.83x | ZAC402.83 Million | ZAC58.95 Million | ▲ +183.0% |
| 2004 | 2.41x | ZAC115.67 Million | ZAC47.90 Million | ▲ +713.2% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | ZAC10.59 Million | ZAC35.66 Million | — |