Rifa Ind Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.04x

Rifa Ind cash flow-to-debt ratio. Rifa Ind (000760) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩2.33 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩64.66 Billion) in one year. Check Rifa Ind (000760) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩2.33 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩64.66 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Rifa Ind (2011–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Rifa Ind from 2011 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Rifa Ind across 15 annual periods. Check 000760 cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Rifa Ind Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2011–2025)

Rifa Ind cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2011 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rifa Ind. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 000760 cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.05x ₩3.55 Billion ₩64.70 Billion ▲ +284.1%
2024 0.01x ₩896.55 Million ₩62.69 Billion ▼ -64.4%
2023 0.04x ₩2.36 Billion ₩58.67 Billion ▲ +128.0%
2022 -0.14x ₩-4.98 Billion ₩34.71 Billion ▲ +20.1%
2021 -0.18x ₩-7.41 Billion ₩41.28 Billion ▼ -565.6%
2020 -0.03x ₩-2.94 Billion ₩108.89 Billion ▼ -209.0%
2019 0.02x ₩2.59 Billion ₩104.82 Billion ▲ +1864.8%
2018 0.00x ₩131.76 Million ₩104.65 Billion ▲ +104.2%
2017 -0.03x ₩-2.85 Billion ₩96.04 Billion ▼ -202.1%
2016 0.03x ₩2.61 Billion ₩89.60 Billion ▼ -50.4%
2015 0.06x ₩5.30 Billion ₩90.49 Billion ▲ +159.3%
2014 -0.10x ₩-8.46 Billion ₩85.64 Billion ▼ -528.2%
2013 -0.02x ₩-1.37 Billion ₩86.91 Billion ▼ -156.3%
2012 0.03x ₩2.61 Billion ₩93.59 Billion ▲ +86.2%
2011 0.01x ₩1.02 Billion ₩67.80 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.