Binggrae Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.03x

Binggrae cash flow-to-debt ratio. Binggrae (005180) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-10.40 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩341.97 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Binggrae to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-10.40 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩341.97 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Binggrae (2011–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Binggrae from 2011 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Binggrae across 15 annual periods. Check 005180 cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Binggrae Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2011–2025)

Binggrae cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2011 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Binggrae. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 005180 operating cash flow.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.32x ₩89.82 Billion ₩283.53 Billion ▼ -39.5%
2024 0.52x ₩147.14 Billion ₩281.23 Billion ▼ -16.8%
2023 0.63x ₩156.72 Billion ₩249.12 Billion ▲ +1182.6%
2022 -0.06x ₩-11.24 Billion ₩193.50 Billion ▼ -121.2%
2021 0.27x ₩55.50 Billion ₩202.37 Billion ▼ -33.1%
2020 0.41x ₩71.58 Billion ₩174.61 Billion ▼ -25.7%
2019 0.55x ₩62.80 Billion ₩113.78 Billion ▼ -17.2%
2018 0.67x ₩72.58 Billion ₩108.85 Billion ▲ +70.0%
2017 0.39x ₩41.88 Billion ₩106.78 Billion ▼ -39.0%
2016 0.64x ₩65.56 Billion ₩102.00 Billion ▼ -0.9%
2015 0.65x ₩64.72 Billion ₩99.83 Billion ▲ +38.6%
2014 0.47x ₩44.36 Billion ₩94.84 Billion ▼ -12.9%
2013 0.54x ₩51.92 Billion ₩96.69 Billion ▼ -13.7%
2012 0.62x ₩66.66 Billion ₩107.12 Billion ▲ +345.6%
2011 0.14x ₩13.54 Billion ₩96.92 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.