Sk Gas Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.04x

Sk Gas cash flow-to-debt ratio. Sk Gas (018670) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩206.76 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩4.69 Trillion) in one year. Check Sk Gas (018670) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩206.76 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩4.69 Trillion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Sk Gas (2009–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Sk Gas from 2009 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Sk Gas across 15 annual periods. Check Sk Gas (018670) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Sk Gas Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2009–2024)

Sk Gas cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2009 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sk Gas. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Sk Gas cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.08x ₩373.33 Billion ₩4.80 Trillion ▼ -56.0%
2023 0.18x ₩617.22 Billion ₩3.49 Trillion ▲ +340.4%
2022 0.04x ₩140.06 Billion ₩3.49 Trillion ▲ +131.0%
2021 -0.13x ₩-389.01 Billion ₩3.00 Trillion ▼ -247.4%
2020 0.09x ₩228.48 Billion ₩2.60 Trillion ▼ -30.8%
2019 0.13x ₩307.70 Billion ₩2.42 Trillion ▲ +384.5%
2018 -0.04x ₩-94.38 Billion ₩2.11 Trillion ▼ -6.1%
2017 -0.04x ₩-108.17 Billion ₩2.57 Trillion ▲ +7.7%
2016 -0.05x ₩-107.69 Billion ₩2.36 Trillion ▲ +29.9%
2015 -0.07x ₩-159.72 Billion ₩2.45 Trillion ▼ -152.5%
2014 0.12x ₩239.62 Billion ₩1.93 Trillion ▲ +437.6%
2013 0.02x ₩34.83 Billion ₩1.51 Trillion ▼ -89.3%
2012 0.22x ₩413.08 Billion ₩1.92 Trillion ▲ +7543.5%
2010 0.00x ₩3.09 Billion ₩1.10 Trillion ▲ +10.6%
2009 0.00x ₩3.14 Billion ₩1.23 Trillion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.