Namhae Chemical (025860) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.45x

Namhae Chemical (025860) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.45x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩124.52 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩276.43 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Namhae Chemical to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.45x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩124.52 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩276.43 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Namhae Chemical Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Namhae Chemical across 16 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Namhae Chemical to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Namhae Chemical (2001–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Namhae Chemical. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Namhae Chemical market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.50x ₩120.28 Billion ₩239.08 Billion ▲ +55.2%
2023 0.32x ₩101.86 Billion ₩314.23 Billion ▲ +228.4%
2022 -0.25x ₩-96.15 Billion ₩380.91 Billion ▲ +47.1%
2021 -0.48x ₩-118.07 Billion ₩247.51 Billion ▼ -224.1%
2020 0.38x ₩52.50 Billion ₩136.53 Billion ▲ +25.0%
2019 0.31x ₩45.29 Billion ₩147.18 Billion ▲ +374.6%
2018 0.06x ₩7.99 Billion ₩123.22 Billion ▼ -71.3%
2017 0.23x ₩30.72 Billion ₩135.77 Billion ▼ -47.1%
2016 0.43x ₩56.69 Billion ₩132.47 Billion ▼ -30.1%
2015 0.61x ₩79.95 Billion ₩130.60 Billion ▲ +853.3%
2012 -0.08x ₩-18.02 Billion ₩221.80 Billion ▼ -2.2%
2011 -0.08x ₩-20.98 Billion ₩263.86 Billion ▼ -129.3%
2006 0.27x ₩60.20 Billion ₩221.97 Billion ▲ +1344.0%
2004 0.02x ₩6.29 Billion ₩334.83 Billion ▲ +252.2%
2003 0.01x ₩1.43 Billion ₩268.01 Billion ▼ -98.6%
2001 0.38x ₩100.02 Billion ₩265.15 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.