Kss Line Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.03x

Kss Line cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kss Line (044450) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩47.41 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩1.52 Trillion) in one year. Check Kss Line cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩47.41 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩1.52 Trillion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kss Line (2011–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kss Line from 2011 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kss Line across 15 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Kss Line to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Kss Line Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2011–2025)

Kss Line cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2011 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kss Line. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Kss Line (044450) cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.11x ₩154.68 Billion ₩1.39 Trillion ▲ +27.1%
2024 0.09x ₩119.29 Billion ₩1.36 Trillion ▲ +1.2%
2023 0.09x ₩106.90 Billion ₩1.24 Trillion ▼ -3.8%
2022 0.09x ₩112.62 Billion ₩1.25 Trillion ▼ -1.1%
2021 0.09x ₩100.25 Billion ₩1.10 Trillion ▲ +1.0%
2020 0.09x ₩72.02 Billion ₩800.67 Billion ▼ -27.1%
2019 0.12x ₩82.40 Billion ₩667.83 Billion ▼ -2.4%
2018 0.13x ₩82.55 Billion ₩653.24 Billion ▲ +12.5%
2017 0.11x ₩76.11 Billion ₩677.38 Billion ▼ -15.8%
2016 0.13x ₩54.96 Billion ₩411.98 Billion ▼ -17.6%
2015 0.16x ₩53.98 Billion ₩333.55 Billion ▲ +27.8%
2014 0.13x ₩39.34 Billion ₩310.59 Billion ▼ -33.6%
2013 0.19x ₩34.00 Billion ₩178.30 Billion ▲ +16.9%
2012 0.16x ₩28.02 Billion ₩171.79 Billion ▲ +162.4%
2011 0.06x ₩9.73 Billion ₩156.55 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.