KTIS Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.12x

KTIS Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. KTIS Corporation (058860) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩24.01 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩208.31 Billion) in one year. Check how high is KTIS Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.12x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩24.01 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩208.31 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of KTIS Corporation (2009–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of KTIS Corporation from 2009 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for KTIS Corporation across 13 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of KTIS Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

KTIS Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2009–2025)

KTIS Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2009 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for KTIS Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KTIS Corporation cash conversion from operations.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.17x ₩36.21 Billion ₩211.34 Billion ▼ -26.8%
2024 0.23x ₩61.27 Billion ₩261.83 Billion ▲ +12.6%
2023 0.21x ₩50.59 Billion ₩243.52 Billion ▲ +210.9%
2022 0.07x ₩13.31 Billion ₩199.20 Billion ▼ -75.8%
2021 0.28x ₩49.01 Billion ₩177.62 Billion ▲ +56.6%
2020 0.18x ₩22.37 Billion ₩126.89 Billion ▼ -30.9%
2019 0.26x ₩36.63 Billion ₩143.55 Billion ▲ +230.3%
2018 0.08x ₩5.33 Billion ₩69.00 Billion ▼ -68.2%
2017 0.24x ₩15.21 Billion ₩62.57 Billion ▼ -19.1%
2016 0.30x ₩19.26 Billion ₩64.10 Billion ▼ -5.2%
2012 0.32x ₩16.84 Billion ₩53.17 Billion ▼ -1.4%
2011 0.32x ₩16.88 Billion ₩52.50 Billion ▼ -31.6%
2009 0.47x ₩21.62 Billion ₩45.99 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.