Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd (079430) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.00x

Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd (079430) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-1.74 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩358.54 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-1.74 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩358.54 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 079430 cash flow metrics.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd (2011–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd. Check cash flow quality index of Hyundai Livart Furniture Co Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.09x ₩40.58 Billion ₩446.64 Billion ▲ +1540.4%
2023 0.01x ₩2.75 Billion ₩497.10 Billion ▲ +105.4%
2022 -0.10x ₩-42.67 Billion ₩415.63 Billion ▼ -88.7%
2021 -0.05x ₩-20.37 Billion ₩374.59 Billion ▼ -116.6%
2020 0.33x ₩105.42 Billion ₩322.27 Billion ▲ +0.8%
2019 0.32x ₩95.64 Billion ₩294.86 Billion ▲ +1004.0%
2018 0.03x ₩6.80 Billion ₩231.52 Billion ▼ -62.4%
2017 0.08x ₩21.03 Billion ₩269.11 Billion ▲ +104.2%
2016 0.04x ₩5.45 Billion ₩142.45 Billion ▼ -65.5%
2015 0.11x ₩14.82 Billion ₩133.47 Billion ▼ -43.4%
2014 0.20x ₩24.77 Billion ₩126.29 Billion ▲ +48.4%
2013 0.13x ₩18.47 Billion ₩139.72 Billion ▲ +37.8%
2012 0.10x ₩13.29 Billion ₩138.56 Billion ▲ +67.8%
2011 0.06x ₩8.85 Billion ₩154.79 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.