Kpx Holdings (092230) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.01x

Kpx Holdings (092230) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩3.71 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩510.68 Billion) in one year. See 092230 FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩3.71 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩510.68 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Kpx Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Kpx Holdings across 17 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Kpx Holdings to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kpx Holdings (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kpx Holdings. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Kpx Holdings.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.23x ₩109.58 Billion ₩467.83 Billion ▲ +13.1%
2023 0.21x ₩96.43 Billion ₩465.63 Billion ▼ -9.4%
2022 0.23x ₩102.62 Billion ₩448.98 Billion ▲ +527.6%
2021 -0.05x ₩-23.81 Billion ₩445.44 Billion ▼ -121.6%
2020 0.25x ₩89.61 Billion ₩361.95 Billion ▼ -26.8%
2019 0.34x ₩90.48 Billion ₩267.66 Billion ▲ +126.4%
2018 0.15x ₩43.40 Billion ₩290.69 Billion ▼ -22.7%
2017 0.19x ₩62.19 Billion ₩322.03 Billion ▼ -46.7%
2016 0.36x ₩99.16 Billion ₩273.65 Billion ▲ +62.7%
2015 0.22x ₩60.72 Billion ₩272.59 Billion ▼ -29.3%
2014 0.31x ₩92.99 Billion ₩295.23 Billion ▲ +139.0%
2013 0.13x ₩42.29 Billion ₩320.92 Billion ▼ -49.9%
2012 0.26x ₩89.53 Billion ₩340.55 Billion ▲ +122.7%
2011 0.12x ₩33.57 Billion ₩284.28 Billion ▼ -64.5%
2010 0.33x ₩100.44 Billion ₩301.59 Billion ▲ +2.9%
2009 0.32x ₩71.92 Billion ₩222.12 Billion ▼ -21.9%
2008 0.41x ₩91.87 Billion ₩221.73 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.