Daedong Gear Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.03x

Daedong Gear Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Daedong Gear Co. Ltd (008830) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩5.28 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩190.40 Billion) in one year. Check Daedong Gear Co. Ltd (008830) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩5.28 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩190.40 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Daedong Gear Co. Ltd (2014–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Daedong Gear Co. Ltd from 2014 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Daedong Gear Co. Ltd across 12 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Daedong Gear Co. Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Daedong Gear Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2014–2025)

Daedong Gear Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2014 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Daedong Gear Co. Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Daedong Gear Co. Ltd.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.05x ₩9.63 Billion ₩190.40 Billion ▲ +47.7%
2024 0.03x ₩5.61 Billion ₩163.86 Billion ▼ -63.9%
2023 0.09x ₩15.08 Billion ₩159.15 Billion ▲ +823.5%
2022 0.01x ₩1.76 Billion ₩171.57 Billion ▲ +291.7%
2021 0.00x ₩382.09 Million ₩145.86 Billion ▼ -97.3%
2020 0.10x ₩12.51 Billion ₩128.19 Billion ▲ +99.3%
2019 0.05x ₩6.15 Billion ₩125.46 Billion ▼ -50.5%
2018 0.10x ₩11.27 Billion ₩113.84 Billion ▲ +12.1%
2017 0.09x ₩10.87 Billion ₩123.14 Billion ▲ +834.1%
2016 -0.01x ₩-1.26 Billion ₩104.75 Billion ▼ -112.3%
2015 0.10x ₩10.04 Billion ₩102.61 Billion ▲ +22.7%
2014 0.08x ₩7.50 Billion ₩94.12 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.