Korea Ratings Co. Ltd (034950) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.12x

Korea Ratings Co. Ltd (034950) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩4.73 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩38.61 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Korea Ratings Co. Ltd's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.12x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩4.73 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩38.61 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Korea Ratings Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Korea Ratings Co. Ltd across 16 annual periods. Also explore Korea Ratings Co. Ltd asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Korea Ratings Co. Ltd (2009–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Korea Ratings Co. Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 034950 market cap overview.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.63x ₩35.40 Billion ₩56.33 Billion ▼ -22.5%
2023 0.81x ₩27.65 Billion ₩34.10 Billion ▲ +62.6%
2022 0.50x ₩24.43 Billion ₩48.98 Billion ▼ -9.2%
2021 0.55x ₩33.59 Billion ₩61.15 Billion ▲ +2.5%
2020 0.54x ₩30.55 Billion ₩57.00 Billion ▼ -11.8%
2019 0.61x ₩32.35 Billion ₩53.22 Billion ▲ +16.6%
2018 0.52x ₩22.75 Billion ₩43.63 Billion ▼ -8.8%
2017 0.57x ₩22.73 Billion ₩39.78 Billion ▲ +24.0%
2016 0.46x ₩16.51 Billion ₩35.80 Billion ▲ +1.6%
2015 0.45x ₩16.08 Billion ₩35.45 Billion ▼ -36.2%
2014 0.71x ₩15.51 Billion ₩21.79 Billion ▼ -20.3%
2013 0.89x ₩19.06 Billion ₩21.34 Billion ▼ -1.0%
2012 0.90x ₩22.25 Billion ₩24.66 Billion ▲ +60.9%
2011 0.56x ₩12.07 Billion ₩21.51 Billion ▼ -27.3%
2010 0.77x ₩16.27 Billion ₩21.08 Billion ▼ -5.3%
2009 0.82x ₩16.06 Billion ₩19.70 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.