HRS Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.04x

HRS Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. HRS Co. Ltd (036640) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-488.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩12.89 Billion) in one year. Check HRS Co. Ltd earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-488.25 Million
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩12.89 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of HRS Co. Ltd (2011–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of HRS Co. Ltd from 2011 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for HRS Co. Ltd across 15 annual periods. Check HRS Co. Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

HRS Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2011–2025)

HRS Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2011 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for HRS Co. Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HRS Co. Ltd cash conversion from operations.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 1.21x ₩15.65 Billion ₩12.89 Billion ▲ +12.8%
2024 1.08x ₩14.17 Billion ₩13.17 Billion ▼ -41.9%
2023 1.85x ₩20.35 Billion ₩11.00 Billion ▲ +29.7%
2022 1.43x ₩14.87 Billion ₩10.43 Billion ▲ +2208.4%
2021 -0.07x ₩-1.44 Billion ₩21.24 Billion ▼ -107.3%
2020 0.92x ₩10.03 Billion ₩10.87 Billion ▼ -21.7%
2019 1.18x ₩19.91 Billion ₩16.90 Billion ▲ +318.9%
2018 -0.54x ₩-17.32 Billion ₩32.19 Billion ▼ -511.0%
2017 0.13x ₩2.97 Billion ₩22.64 Billion ▲ +9.4%
2016 0.12x ₩2.70 Billion ₩22.55 Billion ▼ -69.1%
2015 0.39x ₩6.37 Billion ₩16.43 Billion ▼ -4.5%
2014 0.41x ₩6.92 Billion ₩17.04 Billion ▼ -1.1%
2013 0.41x ₩6.89 Billion ₩16.77 Billion ▲ +148.9%
2012 0.16x ₩1.69 Billion ₩10.22 Billion ▼ -81.8%
2011 0.91x ₩9.50 Billion ₩10.49 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.