InBody Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.25x

InBody Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. InBody Co.Ltd (041830) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.25x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩9.04 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩36.31 Billion) in one year. Check InBody Co.Ltd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.25x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩9.04 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩36.31 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of InBody Co.Ltd (2011–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of InBody Co.Ltd from 2011 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for InBody Co.Ltd across 14 annual periods. Check 041830 total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

InBody Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2011–2024)

InBody Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2011 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for InBody Co.Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does InBody Co.Ltd generate cash.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.90x ₩28.58 Billion ₩31.91 Billion ▼ -43.0%
2023 1.57x ₩38.69 Billion ₩24.62 Billion ▲ +41.6%
2022 1.11x ₩30.42 Billion ₩27.41 Billion ▼ -26.8%
2021 1.52x ₩30.35 Billion ₩20.03 Billion ▼ -14.5%
2020 1.77x ₩28.50 Billion ₩16.09 Billion ▲ +11.3%
2019 1.59x ₩24.21 Billion ₩15.21 Billion ▼ -34.4%
2018 2.43x ₩17.70 Billion ₩7.30 Billion ▼ -27.6%
2017 3.35x ₩18.58 Billion ₩5.55 Billion ▼ -12.6%
2016 3.83x ₩18.24 Billion ₩4.76 Billion ▲ +112.9%
2015 1.80x ₩11.18 Billion ₩6.21 Billion ▼ -37.5%
2014 2.88x ₩10.26 Billion ₩3.56 Billion ▼ -12.9%
2013 3.31x ₩6.99 Billion ₩2.11 Billion ▲ +54.1%
2012 2.15x ₩4.36 Billion ₩2.03 Billion ▼ -33.4%
2011 3.23x ₩5.50 Billion ₩1.70 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.