GSE Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.01x

GSE Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. GSE Co. Ltd (053050) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩1.31 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩120.09 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of GSE Co. Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩1.31 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩120.09 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of GSE Co. Ltd (2008–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of GSE Co. Ltd from 2008 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for GSE Co. Ltd across 15 annual periods. Check GSE Co. Ltd (053050) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

GSE Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2008–2024)

GSE Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2008 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GSE Co. Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of GSE Co. Ltd.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.10x ₩14.46 Billion ₩143.99 Billion ▲ +14.2%
2023 0.09x ₩10.27 Billion ₩116.79 Billion ▼ -42.8%
2022 0.15x ₩17.83 Billion ₩116.05 Billion ▼ -5.8%
2021 0.16x ₩15.75 Billion ₩96.48 Billion ▲ +12.5%
2020 0.15x ₩13.55 Billion ₩93.45 Billion ▲ +9.3%
2019 0.13x ₩11.96 Billion ₩90.14 Billion ▼ -31.5%
2018 0.19x ₩16.88 Billion ₩87.10 Billion ▲ +27.5%
2017 0.15x ₩12.58 Billion ₩82.77 Billion ▲ +10.4%
2016 0.14x ₩11.04 Billion ₩80.21 Billion ▼ -16.6%
2015 0.17x ₩13.26 Billion ₩80.28 Billion ▲ +58.1%
2014 0.10x ₩9.32 Billion ₩89.21 Billion ▼ -22.0%
2012 0.13x ₩10.20 Billion ₩76.20 Billion ▼ -4.6%
2011 0.14x ₩10.45 Billion ₩74.44 Billion ▲ +101.4%
2010 0.07x ₩4.91 Billion ₩70.39 Billion ▼ -70.1%
2008 0.23x ₩8.88 Billion ₩38.07 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.