Huvitz Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.01x

Huvitz Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Huvitz Co. Ltd (065510) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-1.08 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩113.72 Billion) in one year. Check Huvitz Co. Ltd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-1.08 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩113.72 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Huvitz Co. Ltd (2011–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Huvitz Co. Ltd from 2011 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Huvitz Co. Ltd across 14 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Huvitz Co. Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Huvitz Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2011–2024)

Huvitz Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2011 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Huvitz Co. Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 065510 operating cash flow.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.05x ₩4.91 Billion ₩100.35 Billion ▼ -71.3%
2023 0.17x ₩15.46 Billion ₩90.57 Billion ▲ +43.4%
2022 0.12x ₩8.83 Billion ₩74.21 Billion ▼ -65.9%
2021 0.35x ₩22.85 Billion ₩65.44 Billion ▲ +163.9%
2020 0.13x ₩10.18 Billion ₩76.99 Billion ▼ -37.6%
2019 0.21x ₩13.55 Billion ₩63.92 Billion ▲ +46.2%
2018 0.14x ₩8.37 Billion ₩57.76 Billion ▼ -9.1%
2017 0.16x ₩9.92 Billion ₩62.20 Billion ▼ -19.7%
2016 0.20x ₩12.37 Billion ₩62.27 Billion ▼ -17.0%
2015 0.24x ₩10.93 Billion ₩45.69 Billion ▼ -1.9%
2014 0.24x ₩10.18 Billion ₩41.71 Billion ▲ +45.7%
2013 0.17x ₩6.08 Billion ₩36.34 Billion ▼ -73.0%
2012 0.62x ₩11.52 Billion ₩18.55 Billion ▼ -17.4%
2011 0.75x ₩12.37 Billion ₩16.44 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.