Finetechnix. Co.Ltd (106240) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.10x

Finetechnix. Co.Ltd (106240) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-4.95 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩51.13 Billion) in one year. See Finetechnix. Co.Ltd (106240) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.10x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-4.95 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩51.13 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Finetechnix. Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Finetechnix. Co.Ltd across 16 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Finetechnix. Co.Ltd.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Finetechnix. Co.Ltd (2010–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Finetechnix. Co.Ltd. Check how high is Finetechnix. Co.Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.03x ₩1.51 Billion ₩53.05 Billion ▼ -65.5%
2024 0.08x ₩5.96 Billion ₩72.24 Billion ▲ +73.1%
2023 0.05x ₩3.25 Billion ₩68.12 Billion ▼ -86.8%
2022 0.36x ₩27.09 Billion ₩74.94 Billion ▲ +58.0%
2021 0.23x ₩46.53 Billion ₩203.36 Billion ▲ +50.5%
2020 0.15x ₩11.85 Billion ₩77.93 Billion ▲ +729.7%
2019 0.02x ₩1.56 Billion ₩85.00 Billion ▲ +94.3%
2018 0.01x ₩1.04 Billion ₩110.02 Billion ▼ -67.8%
2017 0.03x ₩4.01 Billion ₩136.79 Billion ▲ +144.3%
2016 -0.07x ₩-9.77 Billion ₩147.76 Billion ▼ -184.3%
2015 0.08x ₩17.88 Billion ₩227.74 Billion ▼ -36.3%
2014 0.12x ₩25.62 Billion ₩207.77 Billion ▲ +373.0%
2013 0.03x ₩6.18 Billion ₩236.84 Billion ▲ +141.9%
2012 0.01x ₩2.59 Billion ₩240.48 Billion ▼ -91.1%
2011 0.12x ₩27.74 Billion ₩228.82 Billion ▼ -56.1%
2010 0.28x ₩35.22 Billion ₩127.68 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.