SGA Solutions Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.05x

SGA Solutions Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. SGA Solutions Co.Ltd (184230) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-5.11 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩94.61 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of SGA Solutions Co.Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-5.11 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩94.61 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SGA Solutions Co.Ltd (2014–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SGA Solutions Co.Ltd from 2014 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for SGA Solutions Co.Ltd across 12 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of SGA Solutions Co.Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

SGA Solutions Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2014–2025)

SGA Solutions Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2014 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SGA Solutions Co.Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SGA Solutions Co.Ltd (184230) cash conversion ratio.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.14x ₩14.10 Billion ₩99.02 Billion ▼ -2.7%
2024 0.15x ₩8.89 Billion ₩60.77 Billion ▲ +707357.8%
2023 0.00x ₩719.46K ₩34.78 Billion ▼ -100.0%
2022 0.07x ₩3.26 Billion ₩45.87 Billion ▼ -68.7%
2021 0.23x ₩6.25 Billion ₩27.52 Billion ▼ -15.4%
2020 0.27x ₩5.95 Billion ₩22.15 Billion ▲ +660.6%
2019 -0.05x ₩-1.43 Billion ₩29.80 Billion ▼ -250.1%
2018 -0.01x ₩-551.96 Million ₩40.33 Billion ▲ +90.9%
2017 -0.15x ₩-5.23 Billion ₩34.74 Billion ▼ -701.5%
2016 0.03x ₩1.38 Billion ₩55.25 Billion ▲ +148.5%
2015 -0.05x ₩-1.02 Billion ₩19.73 Billion ▼ -105.8%
2014 0.88x ₩4.45 Billion ₩5.04 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.