Echomarketing Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.09x

Echomarketing Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Echomarketing Co.Ltd (230360) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-14.69 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩167.42 Billion) in one year. Check Echomarketing Co.Ltd (230360) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.09x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-14.69 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩167.42 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Echomarketing Co.Ltd (2014–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Echomarketing Co.Ltd from 2014 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Echomarketing Co.Ltd across 12 annual periods. Check Echomarketing Co.Ltd (230360) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Echomarketing Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2014–2025)

Echomarketing Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2014 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Echomarketing Co.Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Echomarketing Co.Ltd (230360) cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.24x ₩37.57 Billion ₩154.95 Billion ▲ +69.7%
2024 0.14x ₩17.34 Billion ₩121.32 Billion ▼ -63.0%
2023 0.39x ₩35.54 Billion ₩91.99 Billion ▼ -4.8%
2022 0.41x ₩48.17 Billion ₩118.73 Billion ▲ +12.7%
2021 0.36x ₩42.41 Billion ₩117.79 Billion ▼ -64.6%
2020 1.02x ₩51.06 Billion ₩50.23 Billion ▲ +57.2%
2019 0.65x ₩21.29 Billion ₩32.93 Billion ▲ +36.4%
2018 0.47x ₩14.53 Billion ₩30.65 Billion ▲ +43.4%
2017 0.33x ₩7.25 Billion ₩21.92 Billion ▼ -41.2%
2016 0.56x ₩5.82 Billion ₩10.35 Billion ▼ -44.0%
2015 1.00x ₩12.96 Billion ₩12.91 Billion ▲ +70.4%
2014 0.59x ₩5.95 Billion ₩10.10 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.