James Latham PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
James Latham PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio. James Latham PLC (LTHM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX10.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX54.97 Million) in one year. Check LTHM total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of James Latham PLC (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of James Latham PLC from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for James Latham PLC across 34 annual periods. Check how high is James Latham PLC's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
James Latham PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
James Latham PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for James Latham PLC. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see James Latham PLC cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.31x | GBX17.02 Million | GBX54.97 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2024 | 0.43x | GBX23.57 Million | GBX54.47 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.66x | GBX36.31 Million | GBX54.78 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | GBX20.66 Million | GBX60.84 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2021 | 0.37x | GBX18.13 Million | GBX48.91 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | GBX9.67 Million | GBX49.81 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | GBX7.46 Million | GBX40.79 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | GBX8.45 Million | GBX41.97 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | GBX9.25 Million | GBX49.03 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | GBX9.66 Million | GBX38.58 Million | ▲ +143.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | GBX4.18 Million | GBX40.59 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | GBX6.65 Million | GBX36.90 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | GBX4.30 Million | GBX39.83 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | GBX5.04 Million | GBX37.83 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | GBX2.91 Million | GBX33.50 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | GBX1.81 Million | GBX29.91 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | GBX5.23 Million | GBX25.29 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | GBX3.86 Million | GBX27.75 Million | ▲ +227.5% |
| 2007 | -0.11x | GBX-2.57 Million | GBX23.59 Million | ▼ -107.5% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | GBX-1.31 Million | GBX25.04 Million | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | GBX-2.75 Million | GBX35.36 Million | ▼ -356.7% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | GBX694.00K | GBX22.94 Million | ▲ +122.5% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | GBX-2.83 Million | GBX21.00 Million | ▼ -240.1% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | GBX-623.00K | GBX15.73 Million | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | GBX1.56 Million | GBX15.12 Million | ▲ +2789.6% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | GBX-56.00K | GBX14.60 Million | ▼ -105.6% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | GBX1.46 Million | GBX21.41 Million | ▲ +2101.6% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | GBX-68.00K | GBX20.03 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | GBX926.00K | GBX22.41 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | GBX1.07 Million | GBX20.77 Million | ▲ +176.5% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | GBX409.00K | GBX21.91 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | GBX1.19 Million | GBX20.37 Million | ▲ +236.1% |
| 1993 | -0.04x | GBX-868.00K | GBX20.30 Million | ▼ -168.5% |
| 1992 | 0.06x | GBX1.14 Million | GBX18.29 Million | — |