James Latham PLC (LTHM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
James Latham PLC (LTHM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX10.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX54.97 Million) in one year. See James Latham PLC free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
James Latham PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for James Latham PLC across 34 annual periods. Also explore LTHM net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for James Latham PLC (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for James Latham PLC. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LTHM company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.31x | GBX17.02 Million | GBX54.97 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2024 | 0.43x | GBX23.57 Million | GBX54.47 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.66x | GBX36.31 Million | GBX54.78 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | GBX20.66 Million | GBX60.84 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2021 | 0.37x | GBX18.13 Million | GBX48.91 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | GBX9.67 Million | GBX49.81 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | GBX7.46 Million | GBX40.79 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | GBX8.45 Million | GBX41.97 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | GBX9.25 Million | GBX49.03 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | GBX9.66 Million | GBX38.58 Million | ▲ +143.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | GBX4.18 Million | GBX40.59 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | GBX6.65 Million | GBX36.90 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | GBX4.30 Million | GBX39.83 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | GBX5.04 Million | GBX37.83 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | GBX2.91 Million | GBX33.50 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | GBX1.81 Million | GBX29.91 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | GBX5.23 Million | GBX25.29 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | GBX3.86 Million | GBX27.75 Million | ▲ +227.5% |
| 2007 | -0.11x | GBX-2.57 Million | GBX23.59 Million | ▼ -107.5% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | GBX-1.31 Million | GBX25.04 Million | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | GBX-2.75 Million | GBX35.36 Million | ▼ -356.7% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | GBX694.00K | GBX22.94 Million | ▲ +122.5% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | GBX-2.83 Million | GBX21.00 Million | ▼ -240.1% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | GBX-623.00K | GBX15.73 Million | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | GBX1.56 Million | GBX15.12 Million | ▲ +2789.6% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | GBX-56.00K | GBX14.60 Million | ▼ -105.6% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | GBX1.46 Million | GBX21.41 Million | ▲ +2101.6% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | GBX-68.00K | GBX20.03 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | GBX926.00K | GBX22.41 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | GBX1.07 Million | GBX20.77 Million | ▲ +176.5% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | GBX409.00K | GBX21.91 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | GBX1.19 Million | GBX20.37 Million | ▲ +236.1% |
| 1993 | -0.04x | GBX-868.00K | GBX20.30 Million | ▼ -168.5% |
| 1992 | 0.06x | GBX1.14 Million | GBX18.29 Million | — |