James Latham PLC (LTHM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
James Latham PLC (LTHM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX10.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX54.97 Million) in one year. Check LTHM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
James Latham PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for James Latham PLC across 34 annual periods. Also explore LTHM total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for James Latham PLC (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for James Latham PLC. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see James Latham PLC (LTHM) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.31x | GBX17.02 Million | GBX54.97 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2024 | 0.43x | GBX23.57 Million | GBX54.47 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.66x | GBX36.31 Million | GBX54.78 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | GBX20.66 Million | GBX60.84 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2021 | 0.37x | GBX18.13 Million | GBX48.91 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | GBX9.67 Million | GBX49.81 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | GBX7.46 Million | GBX40.79 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | GBX8.45 Million | GBX41.97 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | GBX9.25 Million | GBX49.03 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | GBX9.66 Million | GBX38.58 Million | ▲ +143.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | GBX4.18 Million | GBX40.59 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | GBX6.65 Million | GBX36.90 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | GBX4.30 Million | GBX39.83 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | GBX5.04 Million | GBX37.83 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | GBX2.91 Million | GBX33.50 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | GBX1.81 Million | GBX29.91 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | GBX5.23 Million | GBX25.29 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | GBX3.86 Million | GBX27.75 Million | ▲ +227.5% |
| 2007 | -0.11x | GBX-2.57 Million | GBX23.59 Million | ▼ -107.5% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | GBX-1.31 Million | GBX25.04 Million | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | GBX-2.75 Million | GBX35.36 Million | ▼ -356.7% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | GBX694.00K | GBX22.94 Million | ▲ +122.5% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | GBX-2.83 Million | GBX21.00 Million | ▼ -240.1% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | GBX-623.00K | GBX15.73 Million | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | GBX1.56 Million | GBX15.12 Million | ▲ +2789.6% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | GBX-56.00K | GBX14.60 Million | ▼ -105.6% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | GBX1.46 Million | GBX21.41 Million | ▲ +2101.6% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | GBX-68.00K | GBX20.03 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | GBX926.00K | GBX22.41 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | GBX1.07 Million | GBX20.77 Million | ▲ +176.5% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | GBX409.00K | GBX21.91 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | GBX1.19 Million | GBX20.37 Million | ▲ +236.1% |
| 1993 | -0.04x | GBX-868.00K | GBX20.30 Million | ▼ -168.5% |
| 1992 | 0.06x | GBX1.14 Million | GBX18.29 Million | — |