Temple Bar Investment Trust (TMPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.19x

Temple Bar Investment Trust (TMPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of £14.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (£76.82 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Temple Bar Investment Trust to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.19x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

£14.82 Million
GBP

Total Liabilities

£76.82 Million
GBP

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Temple Bar Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Temple Bar Investment Trust across 15 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Temple Bar Investment Trust for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Temple Bar Investment Trust (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Temple Bar Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Temple Bar Investment Trust worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (GBP) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.41x £31.48 Million £76.82 Million ▼ -3.6%
2024 0.43x £32.53 Million £76.49 Million ▲ +23.1%
2023 0.35x £26.64 Million £77.14 Million ▼ -18.6%
2022 0.42x £32.59 Million £76.78 Million ▲ +31.3%
2021 0.32x £24.15 Million £74.67 Million ▲ +450.2%
2020 0.06x £6.76 Million £114.96 Million ▼ -84.2%
2019 0.37x £42.76 Million £115.11 Million ▲ +38.4%
2018 0.27x £30.91 Million £115.18 Million ▲ +6.3%
2017 0.25x £29.05 Million £115.08 Million ▼ -24.6%
2016 0.33x £38.48 Million £115.02 Million ▲ +192.9%
2015 0.11x £13.12 Million £114.85 Million ▲ +13.3%
2014 0.10x £11.58 Million £114.82 Million ▲ +116.9%
2013 -0.60x £-69.13 Million £115.54 Million ▼ -190.7%
2012 0.66x £42.36 Million £64.20 Million ▲ +87.7%
2011 0.35x £22.68 Million £64.53 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.