Volex Plc (VLX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of March 2026:
0.08x
Volex Plc (VLX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX48.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX586.67 Million) in one year. See VLX FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.08x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
GBX48.13 Million
GBX
Total Liabilities
GBX586.67 Million
GBX
Data as of
Mar 2026
Most recent filing
Volex Plc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Volex Plc across 44 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Volex Plc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Volex Plc (1992–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Volex Plc. Check VLX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.12x | GBX69.57 Million | GBX586.67 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2025 | 0.14x | GBX77.30 Million | GBX546.40 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | GBX78.30 Million | GBX503.50 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | GBX45.15 Million | GBX245.20 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | GBX55.70 Million | GBX301.73 Million | ▲ +194.2% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | GBX14.11 Million | GBX224.78 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | GBX18.50 Million | GBX294.05 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | GBX27.97 Million | GBX165.16 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | GBX38.70 Million | GBX228.50 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2020 | 0.55x | GBX42.16 Million | GBX76.48 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2020 | 0.47x | GBX51.73 Million | GBX110.94 Million | ▲ +739.4% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | GBX-6.68 Million | GBX91.65 Million | ▼ -259.0% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | GBX4.89 Million | GBX106.69 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | GBX5.19 Million | GBX106.69 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | GBX15.90 Million | GBX106.24 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | GBX15.28 Million | GBX106.24 Million | ▲ +895.1% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | GBX1.80 Million | GBX124.42 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | GBX1.73 Million | GBX124.42 Million | ▼ -75.1% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | GBX7.80 Million | GBX139.26 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | GBX7.80 Million | GBX139.26 Million | ▲ +173.0% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | GBX-11.07 Million | GBX144.27 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | GBX-11.07 Million | GBX144.27 Million | ▼ -292.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | GBX6.37 Million | GBX159.79 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | GBX30.35 Million | GBX181.56 Million | ▲ +161.0% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | GBX11.54 Million | GBX180.17 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | GBX15.18 Million | GBX159.91 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | GBX18.64 Million | GBX156.51 Million | ▲ +225.6% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | GBX-17.17 Million | GBX181.07 Million | ▼ -300.8% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | GBX7.71 Million | GBX163.33 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | GBX8.59 Million | GBX152.46 Million | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | GBX-8.47 Million | GBX178.94 Million | ▼ -343.2% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | GBX3.00 Million | GBX154.27 Million | ▼ -81.6% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | GBX15.16 Million | GBX143.21 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | GBX23.16 Million | GBX140.67 Million | ▲ +256.5% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | GBX9.22 Million | GBX199.64 Million | ▲ +364.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | GBX-3.54 Million | GBX202.75 Million | ▼ -151.9% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | GBX4.06 Million | GBX120.57 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | GBX12.01 Million | GBX101.29 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | GBX8.60 Million | GBX95.31 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | GBX9.09 Million | GBX90.25 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | GBX7.71 Million | GBX96.12 Million | ▲ +102.5% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | GBX2.77 Million | GBX69.94 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | GBX5.96 Million | GBX71.92 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | GBX5.99 Million | GBX47.59 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.