Zinc Media Group (ZIN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zinc Media Group (ZIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX78.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX18.75 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Zinc Media Group to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Zinc Media Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Zinc Media Group across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Zinc Media Group (ZIN) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zinc Media Group (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zinc Media Group. Check Zinc Media Group cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | GBX-885.00K | GBX18.75 Million | ▼ -219.0% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | GBX785.00K | GBX19.80 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | GBX3.09 Million | GBX18.54 Million | ▲ +161.0% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | GBX-4.69 Million | GBX17.15 Million | ▼ -1221.1% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | GBX-245.00K | GBX11.84 Million | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2020 | -0.07x | GBX-824.00K | GBX11.96 Million | ▼ -310.6% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | GBX440.00K | GBX13.45 Million | ▲ +115.5% |
| 2018 | -0.21x | GBX-2.36 Million | GBX11.21 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | GBX-1.25 Million | GBX9.55 Million | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2016 | -0.25x | GBX-3.38 Million | GBX13.57 Million | ▼ -386.1% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | GBX-881.00K | GBX17.18 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | GBX-1.51 Million | GBX17.88 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2012 | -0.10x | GBX-2.26 Million | GBX23.43 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | GBX-2.92 Million | GBX26.86 Million | ▼ -874.9% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | GBX-338.00K | GBX30.30 Million | ▼ -119.7% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | GBX2.38 Million | GBX42.00 Million | ▲ +185.9% |
| 2008 | -0.07x | GBX-3.06 Million | GBX46.28 Million | ▼ -162.5% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | GBX3.54 Million | GBX33.51 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | GBX3.10 Million | GBX35.08 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2005 | 0.41x | GBX5.25 Million | GBX12.75 Million | ▲ +168.9% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | GBX636.00K | GBX4.16 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | GBX1.49 Million | GBX3.69 Million | ▲ +17095.1% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | GBX-5.00K | GBX2.10 Million | ▲ +99.6% |
| 2001 | -0.66x | GBX-1.07 Million | GBX1.63 Million | ▼ -968.0% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | GBX496.00K | GBX6.55 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | GBX844.00K | GBX7.09 Million | ▲ +253.6% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | GBX-661.00K | GBX8.52 Million | ▼ -678.7% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | GBX129.00K | GBX9.63 Million | ▲ +113.1% |
| 1994 | -0.10x | GBX-822.00K | GBX8.03 Million | ▼ -259.5% |
| 1992 | -0.03x | GBX-229.00K | GBX8.04 Million | ▼ -128.3% |
| 1991 | 0.10x | GBX932.00K | GBX9.26 Million | — |