Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIGN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.04x

Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIGN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of MX$-1.69 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (MX$38.45 Billion) in one year. Explore CIGN strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

MX$-1.69 Billion
MXN

Total Liabilities

MX$38.45 Billion
MXN

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais across 13 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (2013–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais stock valuation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (MXN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.11x MX$4.08 Billion MX$38.45 Billion ▼ -37.6%
2024 0.17x MX$5.50 Billion MX$32.34 Billion ▼ -22.4%
2023 0.22x MX$6.65 Billion MX$30.34 Billion ▲ +5.6%
2022 0.21x MX$6.61 Billion MX$31.89 Billion ▲ +83.4%
2021 0.11x MX$3.68 Billion MX$32.58 Billion ▼ -51.9%
2020 0.24x MX$8.61 Billion MX$36.60 Billion ▲ +293.0%
2019 0.06x MX$2.04 Billion MX$34.03 Billion ▲ +160.8%
2018 0.02x MX$1.01 Billion MX$43.92 Billion ▲ +10.5%
2017 0.02x MX$579.58 Million MX$27.91 Billion ▼ -50.2%
2016 0.04x MX$1.21 Billion MX$29.10 Billion ▼ -61.4%
2015 0.11x MX$3.01 Billion MX$27.87 Billion ▼ -31.5%
2014 0.16x MX$3.73 Billion MX$23.72 Billion ▼ -23.1%
2013 0.20x MX$3.52 Billion MX$17.18 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.