Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($321.37 Million) in one year. See Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Atlantic American Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Atlantic American Corporation across 34 annual periods. Also explore AAME net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Atlantic American Corporation (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Atlantic American Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AAME market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | $4.80 Million | $293.81 Million | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $2.62 Million | $273.99 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $6.45 Million | $264.87 Million | ▲ +484.4% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $1.09 Million | $261.00 Million | ▼ -87.9% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $8.97 Million | $260.13 Million | ▲ +594.8% |
| 2019 | -0.01x | $-1.81 Million | $259.23 Million | ▼ -138.0% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $4.46 Million | $242.90 Million | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $2.63 Million | $230.26 Million | ▲ +85.2% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $1.32 Million | $213.09 Million | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $2.21 Million | $212.11 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $4.45 Million | $212.81 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $13.02 Million | $218.45 Million | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $6.12 Million | $214.44 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $9.13 Million | $205.85 Million | ▲ +76.4% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $4.90 Million | $194.87 Million | ▲ +704.4% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-768.00K | $184.62 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2008 | -0.03x | $-6.15 Million | $191.19 Million | ▼ -79328.8% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $-15.00K | $370.46 Million | ▼ -103.0% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $496.00K | $364.44 Million | ▼ -95.4% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $11.27 Million | $379.96 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $6.03 Million | $381.55 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $13.91 Million | $356.66 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $13.78 Million | $344.95 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $15.85 Million | $324.49 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $16.71 Million | $292.54 Million | ▲ +188.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $5.40 Million | $272.20 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $5.47 Million | $190.63 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $8.62 Million | $193.68 Million | ▲ +239.4% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.54 Million | $193.86 Million | ▲ +143.5% |
| 1995 | -0.03x | $-5.93 Million | $196.78 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1994 | -0.04x | $-7.50 Million | $173.60 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 1993 | -0.02x | $-3.60 Million | $178.90 Million | ▲ +68.2% |
| 1992 | -0.06x | $-11.80 Million | $186.30 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 1991 | -0.06x | $-11.40 Million | $183.20 Million | — |