Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock (ACFN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock (ACFN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $53.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.68 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock across 36 annual periods. Also explore Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock (ACFN) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | $2.09 Million | $5.02 Million | ▲ +131.0% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $905.00K | $5.02 Million | ▲ +1471.2% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $72.00K | $6.28 Million | ▲ +158.9% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $31.00K | $7.00 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $132.00K | $6.50 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $464.00K | $5.72 Million | ▲ +137.4% |
| 2019 | -0.22x | $-1.22 Million | $5.63 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2018 | -0.47x | $-2.42 Million | $5.15 Million | ▼ -137.8% |
| 2017 | -0.20x | $-1.68 Million | $8.47 Million | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2016 | -0.61x | $-4.52 Million | $7.35 Million | ▼ -1320.4% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | $-981.00K | $22.67 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2014 | -0.79x | $-18.22 Million | $23.15 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2013 | -0.92x | $-17.80 Million | $19.44 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2012 | -1.45x | $-22.24 Million | $15.39 Million | ▼ -199.4% |
| 2011 | -0.48x | $-7.84 Million | $16.24 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2010 | -0.81x | $-14.48 Million | $17.91 Million | ▼ -88.3% |
| 2009 | -0.43x | $-5.43 Million | $12.64 Million | ▼ -97.0% |
| 2008 | -0.22x | $-3.26 Million | $14.93 Million | ▼ -150.2% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | $-2.58 Million | $29.64 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2006 | -0.21x | $-1.59 Million | $7.72 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2005 | -0.19x | $-1.75 Million | $9.35 Million | ▼ -2659.6% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-91.00K | $13.43 Million | ▲ +90.7% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | $-950.00K | $13.11 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-6.01 Million | $24.57 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2001 | -0.39x | $-8.72 Million | $22.34 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-6.14 Million | $19.54 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 1999 | -0.22x | $-5.22 Million | $23.85 Million | ▲ +69.0% |
| 1998 | -0.71x | $-5.80 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1997 | -0.86x | $-9.50 Million | $11.00 Million | ▼ -138.9% |
| 1996 | 2.22x | $15.10 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +405.8% |
| 1995 | 0.44x | $34.20 Million | $77.90 Million | ▲ +225.2% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $5.40 Million | $40.00 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1993 | 0.14x | $4.70 Million | $33.30 Million | ▲ +200.6% |
| 1992 | -0.14x | $-800.00K | $5.70 Million | ▼ -132.7% |
| 1991 | 0.43x | $1.20 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +107.8% |
| 1990 | 0.21x | $660.00K | $3.20 Million | — |