Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock (ACFN) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock (ACFN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 96.9% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($266.00K) from net assets ($8.45 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check cash flow quality index of Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1990–2025)
This chart shows how Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1990 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 96.9%, reflecting net assets of $8.45 Million with intangible assets of $266.00K USD. See net assets of Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock (1990–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock from 1990 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Acorn Energy, Inc. Common Stock stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.7% | $8.32 Million | $22.00K | $13.33 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2024 | 99.6% | $5.58 Million | $21.00K | $10.60 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $752.00K | $0.00 | $9.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $1.89 Million | $0.00 | $9.24 Million | ▲ +31.1 pp |
| 2015 | 68.9% | $1.66 Million | $516.00K | $24.33 Million | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2014 | 81.1% | $6.39 Million | $1.21 Million | $29.54 Million | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2013 | 88.1% | $31.51 Million | $3.73 Million | $50.96 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2012 | 81.6% | $51.95 Million | $9.56 Million | $67.34 Million | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 2011 | 93.1% | $69.57 Million | $4.78 Million | $85.81 Million | ▲ +15.3 pp |
| 2010 | 77.8% | $41.88 Million | $9.30 Million | $59.78 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2009 | 77.3% | $36.10 Million | $8.19 Million | $48.73 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2008 | 71.3% | $36.12 Million | $10.36 Million | $51.05 Million | ▼ -19.8 pp |
| 2007 | 91.1% | $67.33 Million | $5.99 Million | $96.97 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 90.1% | $820.00K | $81.00K | $10.17 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2004 | 97.7% | $3.60 Million | $81.00K | $17.02 Million | ▲ +97.2 pp |
| 2003 | 0.5% | $4.57 Million | $4.54 Million | $17.67 Million | ▼ -38.5 pp |
| 2002 | 39.0% | $8.74 Million | $5.33 Million | $33.30 Million | ▼ -55.7 pp |
| 2001 | 94.6% | $16.95 Million | $909.00K | $39.29 Million | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2000 | 87.5% | $22.62 Million | $2.83 Million | $42.16 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 1999 | 82.6% | $24.56 Million | $4.29 Million | $48.41 Million | ▼ -16.4 pp |
| 1998 | 98.9% | $65.00 Million | $700.00K | $73.20 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 1997 | 99.7% | $86.50 Million | $300.00K | $97.50 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 1996 | 99.5% | $95.30 Million | $500.00K | $102.10 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 1995 | 99.6% | $197.50 Million | $800.00K | $275.40 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 1994 | 99.2% | $89.30 Million | $700.00K | $129.30 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 1993 | 92.2% | $38.40 Million | $3.00 Million | $71.70 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 1992 | 83.3% | $13.80 Million | $2.30 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +30.7 pp |
| 1991 | 52.6% | $1.90 Million | $900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +27.6 pp |
| 1990 | 25.0% | $1.20 Million | $900.00K | $4.40 Million | — |