Synalloy Corporation (ACNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Synalloy Corporation (ACNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.26x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.43 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.97 Million) in one year. See Synalloy Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Synalloy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Synalloy Corporation across 40 annual periods. Also explore ACNT net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Synalloy Corporation (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Synalloy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Synalloy Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-519.00K | $24.95 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $14.68 Million | $53.70 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $23.08 Million | $55.88 Million | ▲ +898.0% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $5.58 Million | $134.78 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $19.05 Million | $154.41 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $17.98 Million | $126.69 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $28.64 Million | $150.69 Million | ▲ +212.8% |
| 2018 | -0.17x | $-21.22 Million | $125.91 Million | ▼ -629.1% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $2.24 Million | $70.17 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $1.46 Million | $50.05 Million | ▼ -90.7% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $16.46 Million | $52.62 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $28.89 Million | $78.39 Million | ▲ +478.7% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-5.54 Million | $56.94 Million | ▼ -556.8% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $1.63 Million | $76.73 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 2011 | -0.13x | $-3.86 Million | $30.30 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2010 | -0.35x | $-6.05 Million | $17.50 Million | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2009 | 1.30x | $20.19 Million | $15.53 Million | ▲ +589.3% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $5.94 Million | $31.50 Million | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $12.33 Million | $38.48 Million | ▲ +272.6% |
| 2006 | -0.19x | $-7.84 Million | $42.23 Million | ▼ -138.1% |
| 2005 | 0.49x | $15.43 Million | $31.69 Million | ▲ +3503.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $503.52K | $37.27 Million | ▲ +111.4% |
| 2003 | -0.12x | $-3.82 Million | $32.37 Million | ▼ -194.1% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $3.27 Million | $26.09 Million | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2001 | 0.33x | $10.10 Million | $30.81 Million | ▲ +454.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $1.94 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -67.4% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $6.05 Million | $33.39 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $10.10 Million | $25.60 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $13.20 Million | $23.40 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 1996 | 0.67x | $18.90 Million | $28.30 Million | ▲ +324.7% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | $5.00 Million | $31.80 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1994 | 0.18x | $4.60 Million | $25.50 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1993 | 0.19x | $4.30 Million | $23.00 Million | ▲ +176.4% |
| 1992 | 0.07x | $1.40 Million | $20.70 Million | ▼ -78.4% |
| 1991 | 0.31x | $6.40 Million | $20.40 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 1990 | 0.47x | $9.70 Million | $20.70 Million | ▲ +691.9% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $1.00 Million | $16.90 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 1988 | 0.31x | $4.80 Million | $15.60 Million | ▲ +178.6% |
| 1986 | -0.39x | $-4.50 Million | $11.50 Million | ▼ -447.8% |
| 1985 | -0.07x | $-1.10 Million | $15.40 Million | — |