Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($188.65 Million) in one year. Explore Acacia Research Corporation strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Acacia Research Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Acacia Research Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore ACTG total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Acacia Research Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Acacia Research Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ACTG company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $75.24 Million | $186.92 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $50.12 Million | $203.78 Million | ▲ +148.0% |
| 2023 | -0.51x | $-22.51 Million | $43.94 Million | ▼ -193.1% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-37.34 Million | $213.61 Million | ▼ -583.2% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $13.33 Million | $368.38 Million | ▲ +141.1% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | $-19.62 Million | $222.99 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2019 | -0.05x | $-2.31 Million | $43.20 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2018 | 0.64x | $20.88 Million | $32.71 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2017 | 1.87x | $24.48 Million | $13.11 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2016 | 1.19x | $34.06 Million | $28.56 Million | ▲ +504.5% |
| 2015 | -0.29x | $-9.95 Million | $33.75 Million | ▼ -433.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $4.18 Million | $47.30 Million | ▲ +178.6% |
| 2013 | -0.11x | $-3.51 Million | $31.20 Million | ▼ -105.4% |
| 2012 | 2.09x | $104.95 Million | $50.24 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2011 | 1.92x | $59.11 Million | $30.77 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2010 | 2.15x | $44.92 Million | $20.93 Million | ▲ +196.8% |
| 2009 | 0.72x | $16.12 Million | $22.29 Million | ▲ +304.1% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $2.60 Million | $14.53 Million | ▲ +142.7% |
| 2007 | -0.42x | $-2.62 Million | $6.25 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2006 | 1.49x | $6.36 Million | $4.28 Million | ▲ +430.6% |
| 2005 | -0.45x | $-2.99 Million | $6.65 Million | ▲ +60.6% |
| 2004 | -1.14x | $-3.96 Million | $3.47 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2003 | -0.93x | $-3.91 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2002 | -0.85x | $-4.42 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -254.2% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | $-12.56 Million | $52.13 Million | ▲ +73.3% |
| 2000 | -0.90x | $-34.69 Million | $38.37 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 1999 | -0.94x | $-6.13 Million | $6.53 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 1998 | -1.95x | $-3.56 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 1997 | -3.83x | $-1.71 Million | $446.57K | ▼ -106.0% |
| 1996 | -1.86x | $-1.53 Million | $822.36K | ▼ -134.3% |
| 1995 | 5.42x | $1.94 Million | $357.98K | — |