Autodesk Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Autodesk Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Autodesk Inc (ADSK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $439.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.30 Billion) in one year. Check ADSK operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Autodesk Inc (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Autodesk Inc from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Autodesk Inc across 36 annual periods. Check ADSK cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Autodesk Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Autodesk Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Autodesk Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Autodesk Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $1.61 Billion | $8.21 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $1.31 Billion | $8.06 Billion | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $2.07 Billion | $8.29 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $1.53 Billion | $7.76 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $1.44 Billion | $6.31 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $1.42 Billion | $6.32 Billion | ▲ +193.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $377.10 Million | $4.94 Billion | ▲ +36961.2% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $900.00K | $4.37 Billion | ▼ -99.5% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $169.70 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $414.00 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $708.10 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $563.50 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $559.10 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2012 | 0.43x | $573.50 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $540.80 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $246.80 Million | $973.70 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $593.90 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2008 | 0.72x | $708.50 Million | $978.40 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0.84x | $576.60 Million | $682.50 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2006 | 0.73x | $415.20 Million | $569.50 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | $373.13 Million | $494.13 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $220.08 Million | $395.52 Million | ▲ +102.9% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $86.23 Million | $314.44 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | $210.16 Million | $373.13 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2001 | 0.59x | $196.12 Million | $335.12 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $103.61 Million | $305.03 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 1999 | 0.63x | $146.70 Million | $233.70 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 1998 | 0.69x | $158.60 Million | $230.60 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1997 | 0.46x | $114.20 Million | $248.60 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1996 | 0.61x | $106.60 Million | $175.60 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1995 | 0.66x | $104.40 Million | $158.60 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1994 | 0.82x | $88.90 Million | $108.00 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 1993 | 0.76x | $68.60 Million | $90.50 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 1992 | 1.20x | $72.90 Million | $60.70 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 1991 | 1.25x | $58.40 Million | $46.90 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 1990 | 1.48x | $52.10 Million | $35.20 Million | — |