Autodesk Inc (ADSK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Autodesk Inc (ADSK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $439.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.30 Billion) in one year. See Autodesk Inc (ADSK) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Autodesk Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Autodesk Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Autodesk Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Autodesk Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Autodesk Inc. Check earnings quality score of Autodesk Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $1.61 Billion | $8.21 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $1.31 Billion | $8.06 Billion | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $2.07 Billion | $8.29 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $1.53 Billion | $7.76 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $1.44 Billion | $6.31 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $1.42 Billion | $6.32 Billion | ▲ +193.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $377.10 Million | $4.94 Billion | ▲ +36961.2% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $900.00K | $4.37 Billion | ▼ -99.5% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $169.70 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $414.00 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $708.10 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $563.50 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $559.10 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2012 | 0.43x | $573.50 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $540.80 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $246.80 Million | $973.70 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $593.90 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2008 | 0.72x | $708.50 Million | $978.40 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0.84x | $576.60 Million | $682.50 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2006 | 0.73x | $415.20 Million | $569.50 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | $373.13 Million | $494.13 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $220.08 Million | $395.52 Million | ▲ +102.9% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $86.23 Million | $314.44 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | $210.16 Million | $373.13 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2001 | 0.59x | $196.12 Million | $335.12 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $103.61 Million | $305.03 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 1999 | 0.63x | $146.70 Million | $233.70 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 1998 | 0.69x | $158.60 Million | $230.60 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1997 | 0.46x | $114.20 Million | $248.60 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1996 | 0.61x | $106.60 Million | $175.60 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1995 | 0.66x | $104.40 Million | $158.60 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1994 | 0.82x | $88.90 Million | $108.00 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 1993 | 0.76x | $68.60 Million | $90.50 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 1992 | 1.20x | $72.90 Million | $60.70 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 1991 | 1.25x | $58.40 Million | $46.90 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 1990 | 1.48x | $52.10 Million | $35.20 Million | — |