Autodesk Inc (ADSK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Autodesk Inc (ADSK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $439.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.30 Billion) in one year. See Autodesk Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Autodesk Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Autodesk Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore ADSK net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Autodesk Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Autodesk Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Autodesk Inc (ADSK) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $1.61 Billion | $8.21 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $1.31 Billion | $8.06 Billion | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $2.07 Billion | $8.29 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $1.53 Billion | $7.76 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $1.44 Billion | $6.31 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $1.42 Billion | $6.32 Billion | ▲ +193.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $377.10 Million | $4.94 Billion | ▲ +36961.2% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $900.00K | $4.37 Billion | ▼ -99.5% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $169.70 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $414.00 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $708.10 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $563.50 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $559.10 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2012 | 0.43x | $573.50 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $540.80 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $246.80 Million | $973.70 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $593.90 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2008 | 0.72x | $708.50 Million | $978.40 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0.84x | $576.60 Million | $682.50 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2006 | 0.73x | $415.20 Million | $569.50 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | $373.13 Million | $494.13 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $220.08 Million | $395.52 Million | ▲ +102.9% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $86.23 Million | $314.44 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | $210.16 Million | $373.13 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2001 | 0.59x | $196.12 Million | $335.12 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $103.61 Million | $305.03 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 1999 | 0.63x | $146.70 Million | $233.70 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 1998 | 0.69x | $158.60 Million | $230.60 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1997 | 0.46x | $114.20 Million | $248.60 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1996 | 0.61x | $106.60 Million | $175.60 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1995 | 0.66x | $104.40 Million | $158.60 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1994 | 0.82x | $88.90 Million | $108.00 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 1993 | 0.76x | $68.60 Million | $90.50 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 1992 | 1.20x | $72.90 Million | $60.70 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 1991 | 1.25x | $58.40 Million | $46.90 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 1990 | 1.48x | $52.10 Million | $35.20 Million | — |