Ainos Inc (AIMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ainos Inc (AIMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-855.02K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.31 Million) in one year. See AIMD free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ainos Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ainos Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore AIMD net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ainos Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ainos Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Ainos Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.35x | $-4.61 Million | $13.31 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2024 | -0.44x | $-5.81 Million | $13.30 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2023 | -0.63x | $-4.69 Million | $7.39 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2022 | -1.23x | $-3.04 Million | $2.48 Million | ▼ -2902.8% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-1.25 Million | $30.63 Million | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2020 | -0.45x | $-499.55K | $1.10 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2019 | -1.21x | $-909.48K | $753.31K | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2018 | -1.38x | $-1.01 Million | $733.62K | ▼ -362.1% |
| 2017 | -0.30x | $-542.70K | $1.82 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2016 | -0.41x | $-520.81K | $1.27 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2015 | -0.62x | $-366.41K | $589.24K | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2014 | -1.23x | $-554.98K | $452.28K | ▼ -813.4% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-664.25K | $4.94 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2012 | -0.12x | $-489.44K | $4.24 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2011 | -0.07x | $-309.70K | $4.22 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2010 | -0.16x | $-584.54K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2009 | -0.18x | $-903.11K | $4.99 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2008 | -0.30x | $-948.81K | $3.14 Million | ▲ +40.5% |
| 2007 | -0.51x | $-1.41 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2006 | -0.53x | $-1.46 Million | $2.75 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2005 | -0.25x | $-655.39K | $2.65 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-328.05K | $2.83 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2003 | -0.10x | $-275.36K | $2.70 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-542.13K | $3.31 Million | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2001 | -0.11x | $-369.86K | $3.22 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2000 | -0.89x | $-2.72 Million | $3.06 Million | ▲ +74.7% |
| 1999 | -3.52x | $-5.67 Million | $1.61 Million | ▼ -389.8% |
| 1998 | -0.72x | $-2.10 Million | $2.92 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1997 | -0.96x | $-2.71 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 1996 | -0.70x | $-1.95 Million | $2.78 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 1995 | -0.41x | $-1.30 Million | $3.20 Million | — |