Ainos Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ainos Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ainos Inc (AIMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.28 Million) in one year. Check Ainos Inc (AIMD) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ainos Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ainos Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ainos Inc across 31 annual periods. Check AIMD total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Ainos Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Ainos Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ainos Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ainos Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.35x | $-4.61 Million | $13.31 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2024 | -0.44x | $-5.81 Million | $13.30 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2023 | -0.63x | $-4.69 Million | $7.39 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2022 | -1.23x | $-3.04 Million | $2.48 Million | ▼ -2902.8% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-1.25 Million | $30.63 Million | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2020 | -0.45x | $-499.55K | $1.10 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2019 | -1.21x | $-909.48K | $753.31K | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2018 | -1.38x | $-1.01 Million | $733.62K | ▼ -362.1% |
| 2017 | -0.30x | $-542.70K | $1.82 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2016 | -0.41x | $-520.81K | $1.27 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2015 | -0.62x | $-366.41K | $589.24K | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2014 | -1.23x | $-554.98K | $452.28K | ▼ -813.4% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-664.25K | $4.94 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2012 | -0.12x | $-489.44K | $4.24 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2011 | -0.07x | $-309.70K | $4.22 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2010 | -0.16x | $-584.54K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2009 | -0.18x | $-903.11K | $4.99 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2008 | -0.30x | $-948.81K | $3.14 Million | ▲ +40.5% |
| 2007 | -0.51x | $-1.41 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2006 | -0.53x | $-1.46 Million | $2.75 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2005 | -0.25x | $-655.39K | $2.65 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-328.05K | $2.83 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2003 | -0.10x | $-275.36K | $2.70 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-542.13K | $3.31 Million | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2001 | -0.11x | $-369.86K | $3.22 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2000 | -0.89x | $-2.72 Million | $3.06 Million | ▲ +74.7% |
| 1999 | -3.52x | $-5.67 Million | $1.61 Million | ▼ -389.8% |
| 1998 | -0.72x | $-2.10 Million | $2.92 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1997 | -0.96x | $-2.71 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 1996 | -0.70x | $-1.95 Million | $2.78 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 1995 | -0.41x | $-1.30 Million | $3.20 Million | — |