Ainos Inc (AIMD) — Net Asset Quality Index
Ainos Inc (AIMD) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 16.8% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $19.56 Million minus total liabilities of $16.28 Million yields net assets of $3.28 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read total liabilities of Ainos Inc for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Ainos Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1995–2025)
This chart shows how Ainos Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 31 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 16.8%, representing net assets of $3.28 Million against total assets of $19.56 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see AIMD market cap.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Ainos Inc (1995–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Ainos Inc from 1995 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Ainos Inc (AIMD) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36.2% | $7.56 Million | $20.87 Million | $13.31 Million | ▼ -17.6 pp |
| 2024 | 53.8% | $15.52 Million | $28.82 Million | $13.30 Million | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2023 | 76.8% | $24.45 Million | $31.84 Million | $7.39 Million | ▼ -16.5 pp |
| 2022 | 93.3% | $34.63 Million | $37.11 Million | $2.48 Million | ▲ +68.3 pp |
| 2021 | 25.0% | $10.20 Million | $40.82 Million | $30.63 Million | ▲ +347.0 pp |
| 2020 | -322.1% | $-838.28K | $260.29K | $1.10 Million | ▼ -295.8 pp |
| 2019 | -26.3% | $-156.68K | $596.63K | $753.31K | ▼ -76.1 pp |
| 2018 | 49.9% | $730.08K | $1.46 Million | $733.62K | ▲ +29.4 pp |
| 2017 | 20.5% | $470.80K | $2.29 Million | $1.82 Million | ▲ +195.6 pp |
| 2016 | -175.0% | $-809.90K | $462.68K | $1.27 Million | ▲ +227.7 pp |
| 2015 | -402.8% | $-472.04K | $117.19K | $589.24K | ▼ -395.5 pp |
| 2014 | -7.3% | $-30.74K | $421.54K | $452.28K | ▲ +2953.6 pp |
| 2013 | -2960.9% | $-4.78 Million | $161.53K | $4.94 Million | ▲ +627.0 pp |
| 2012 | -3587.9% | $-4.13 Million | $115.03K | $4.24 Million | ▼ -19.8 pp |
| 2011 | -3568.1% | $-4.10 Million | $115.00K | $4.22 Million | ▼ -2268.7 pp |
| 2010 | -1299.4% | $-3.37 Million | $259.35K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +687.5 pp |
| 2009 | -1986.9% | $-4.75 Million | $238.93K | $4.99 Million | ▼ -126.6 pp |
| 2008 | -1860.4% | $-2.98 Million | $160.07K | $3.14 Million | ▼ -660.2 pp |
| 2007 | -1200.2% | $-2.57 Million | $213.90K | $2.78 Million | ▼ -594.7 pp |
| 2006 | -605.4% | $-2.36 Million | $390.42K | $2.75 Million | ▲ +132.5 pp |
| 2005 | -738.0% | $-2.33 Million | $315.74K | $2.65 Million | ▲ +1197.7 pp |
| 2004 | -1935.6% | $-2.69 Million | $139.19K | $2.83 Million | ▼ -490.4 pp |
| 2003 | -1445.3% | $-2.52 Million | $174.50K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -205.2 pp |
| 2002 | -1240.0% | $-3.07 Million | $247.29K | $3.31 Million | ▼ -494.8 pp |
| 2001 | -745.2% | $-2.84 Million | $381.10K | $3.22 Million | ▼ -370.2 pp |
| 2000 | -375.0% | $-2.41 Million | $643.88K | $3.06 Million | ▼ -372.0 pp |
| 1999 | -3.0% | $-47.51K | $1.56 Million | $1.61 Million | ▼ -44.5 pp |
| 1998 | 41.5% | $2.07 Million | $4.99 Million | $2.92 Million | ▼ -19.7 pp |
| 1997 | 61.2% | $4.43 Million | $7.25 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 1996 | 71.0% | $6.79 Million | $9.57 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +148.7 pp |
| 1995 | -77.8% | $-1.40 Million | $1.80 Million | $3.20 Million | — |