Alico Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alico Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Alico Inc (ALCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($90.50 Million) in one year. Check how high is Alico Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Alico Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Alico Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Alico Inc across 37 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Alico Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Alico Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Alico Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alico Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Alico Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $20.13 Million | $93.53 Million | ▲ +200.5% |
| 2024 | -0.21x | $-30.50 Million | $142.42 Million | ▼ -509.4% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-6.25 Million | $177.98 Million | ▼ -186.4% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $6.52 Million | $160.39 Million | ▼ -54.9% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $16.50 Million | $183.10 Million | ▲ +1637.0% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $1.05 Million | $202.16 Million | ▼ -97.7% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $48.83 Million | $217.99 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $19.05 Million | $245.83 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $28.23 Million | $253.81 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $30.36 Million | $277.18 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $33.87 Million | $284.58 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $28.85 Million | $95.73 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $13.43 Million | $56.10 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2012 | 0.41x | $23.63 Million | $57.54 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $16.75 Million | $69.37 Million | ▲ +183.7% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $7.11 Million | $83.58 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $16.41 Million | $93.36 Million | ▲ +102.2% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $13.77 Million | $158.44 Million | ▲ +127.7% |
| 2007 | -0.31x | $-52.92 Million | $168.40 Million | ▼ -502.8% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $9.49 Million | $121.65 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $12.05 Million | $103.51 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $13.71 Million | $93.04 Million | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $11.26 Million | $90.36 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $9.54 Million | $78.69 Million | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $9.33 Million | $66.41 Million | ▲ +305.7% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $2.54 Million | $73.33 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $3.70 Million | $65.52 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $4.00 Million | $40.60 Million | ▲ +123.6% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $1.30 Million | $29.50 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $4.00 Million | $37.10 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $4.10 Million | $33.60 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $6.70 Million | $34.20 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $3.90 Million | $29.20 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1992 | 0.33x | $9.40 Million | $28.60 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 1991 | 0.32x | $8.80 Million | $27.20 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1990 | 0.28x | $5.80 Million | $20.70 Million | ▼ -69.9% |
| 1989 | 0.93x | $10.90 Million | $11.70 Million | — |