The Andersons Inc (ANDE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
The Andersons Inc (ANDE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.15x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-393.68 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.61 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of The Andersons Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
The Andersons Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for The Andersons Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore The Andersons Inc (ANDE) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for The Andersons Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for The Andersons Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ANDE company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $177.00 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $331.51 Million | $2.52 Billion | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | $946.75 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▲ +348.1% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $287.12 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▲ +677.2% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-51.05 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-74.43 Million | $3.11 Billion | ▼ -118.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $348.56 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +649.7% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | $-35.52 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -141.7% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $75.28 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $39.59 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▼ -71.9% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $154.13 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▲ +1597.7% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-10.07 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -103.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $337.19 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $328.48 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $290.26 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2010 | -0.19x | $-239.28 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -194.4% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $180.24 Million | $878.12 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $278.66 Million | $943.67 Million | ▲ +275.8% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-164.33 Million | $978.40 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-62.90 Million | $539.17 Million | ▼ -246.4% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $37.88 Million | $475.26 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $62.49 Million | $438.91 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $44.09 Million | $376.83 Million | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $23.25 Million | $364.98 Million | ▲ +474.5% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | $-6.11 Million | $359.14 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | $-18.30 Million | $343.36 Million | ▼ -289.0% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $8.20 Million | $290.80 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $15.40 Million | $277.40 Million | ▲ +209.3% |
| 1997 | -0.05x | $-15.00 Million | $295.40 Million | ▼ -108.7% |
| 1996 | 0.58x | $159.30 Million | $272.80 Million | ▲ +479.5% |
| 1995 | -0.15x | $-60.10 Million | $390.60 Million | ▼ -1063.6% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $177.59K | $11.12 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $89.68K | $9.83 Million | — |