Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.96x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.82 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.95 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Applied DNA Sciences Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Applied DNA Sciences Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Applied DNA Sciences Inc across 27 annual periods. Check Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Applied DNA Sciences Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Applied DNA Sciences Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Applied DNA Sciences Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -4.91x | $-12.24 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2024 | -3.59x | $-13.71 Million | $3.82 Million | ▼ -406.7% |
| 2023 | -0.71x | $-6.22 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2022 | -0.96x | $-8.98 Million | $9.36 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2021 | -4.05x | $-13.39 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2020 | -1.98x | $-11.14 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2019 | -1.55x | $-6.86 Million | $4.41 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2018 | -1.42x | $-6.92 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2017 | -5.77x | $-7.48 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -203.3% |
| 2016 | -1.90x | $-9.90 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2015 | -2.33x | $-6.97 Million | $2.99 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2014 | -1.71x | $-8.51 Million | $4.97 Million | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2013 | -2.09x | $-7.87 Million | $3.76 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2012 | -6.69x | $-3.96 Million | $592.01K | ▼ -700.1% |
| 2011 | -0.84x | $-3.76 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2010 | -0.82x | $-2.46 Million | $3.01 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2009 | -0.76x | $-2.47 Million | $3.25 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 2008 | -0.18x | $-2.93 Million | $15.88 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-2.25 Million | $14.36 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-2.88 Million | $14.26 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2005 | -3.51x | $-9.12 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -447.9% |
| 2004 | -0.64x | $-3.07 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2003 | -0.63x | $-491.51K | $784.79K | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2001 | -10.24x | $-9.87K | $963.00 | ▼ -3185.8% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-400.00 | $1.28K | ▲ +93.5% |
| 1999 | -4.80x | $-4.62K | $963.00 | ▼ -736.9% |
| 1998 | -0.57x | $-3.00K | $5.23K | — |