Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.96x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.82 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.95 Million) in one year. See APDN FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Applied DNA Sciences Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Applied DNA Sciences Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore APDN net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Applied DNA Sciences Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Applied DNA Sciences Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -4.91x | $-12.24 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2024 | -3.59x | $-13.71 Million | $3.82 Million | ▼ -406.7% |
| 2023 | -0.71x | $-6.22 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2022 | -0.96x | $-8.98 Million | $9.36 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2021 | -4.05x | $-13.39 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2020 | -1.98x | $-11.14 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2019 | -1.55x | $-6.86 Million | $4.41 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2018 | -1.42x | $-6.92 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2017 | -5.77x | $-7.48 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -203.3% |
| 2016 | -1.90x | $-9.90 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2015 | -2.33x | $-6.97 Million | $2.99 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2014 | -1.71x | $-8.51 Million | $4.97 Million | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2013 | -2.09x | $-7.87 Million | $3.76 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2012 | -6.69x | $-3.96 Million | $592.01K | ▼ -700.1% |
| 2011 | -0.84x | $-3.76 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2010 | -0.82x | $-2.46 Million | $3.01 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2009 | -0.76x | $-2.47 Million | $3.25 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 2008 | -0.18x | $-2.93 Million | $15.88 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-2.25 Million | $14.36 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-2.88 Million | $14.26 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2005 | -3.51x | $-9.12 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -447.9% |
| 2004 | -0.64x | $-3.07 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2003 | -0.63x | $-491.51K | $784.79K | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2001 | -10.24x | $-9.87K | $963.00 | ▼ -3185.8% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-400.00 | $1.28K | ▲ +93.5% |
| 1999 | -4.80x | $-4.62K | $963.00 | ▼ -736.9% |
| 1998 | -0.57x | $-3.00K | $5.23K | — |