Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.96x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.82 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.95 Million) in one year. Explore APDN long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Applied DNA Sciences Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Applied DNA Sciences Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Applied DNA Sciences Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Applied DNA Sciences Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Applied DNA Sciences Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see APDN market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -4.91x | $-12.24 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2024 | -3.59x | $-13.71 Million | $3.82 Million | ▼ -406.7% |
| 2023 | -0.71x | $-6.22 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2022 | -0.96x | $-8.98 Million | $9.36 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2021 | -4.05x | $-13.39 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2020 | -1.98x | $-11.14 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2019 | -1.55x | $-6.86 Million | $4.41 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2018 | -1.42x | $-6.92 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2017 | -5.77x | $-7.48 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -203.3% |
| 2016 | -1.90x | $-9.90 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2015 | -2.33x | $-6.97 Million | $2.99 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2014 | -1.71x | $-8.51 Million | $4.97 Million | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2013 | -2.09x | $-7.87 Million | $3.76 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2012 | -6.69x | $-3.96 Million | $592.01K | ▼ -700.1% |
| 2011 | -0.84x | $-3.76 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2010 | -0.82x | $-2.46 Million | $3.01 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2009 | -0.76x | $-2.47 Million | $3.25 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 2008 | -0.18x | $-2.93 Million | $15.88 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-2.25 Million | $14.36 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-2.88 Million | $14.26 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2005 | -3.51x | $-9.12 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -447.9% |
| 2004 | -0.64x | $-3.07 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2003 | -0.63x | $-491.51K | $784.79K | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2001 | -10.24x | $-9.87K | $963.00 | ▼ -3185.8% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-400.00 | $1.28K | ▲ +93.5% |
| 1999 | -4.80x | $-4.62K | $963.00 | ▼ -736.9% |
| 1998 | -0.57x | $-3.00K | $5.23K | — |