Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) — Net Asset Quality Index
Applied DNA Sciences Inc (APDN) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 70.3% as of June 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $9.93 Million minus total liabilities of $2.95 Million yields net assets of $6.99 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check APDN cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Applied DNA Sciences Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Applied DNA Sciences Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of June 2025, the index stands at 70.3%, representing net assets of $6.99 Million against total assets of $9.93 Million USD. See shareholders equity of Applied DNA Sciences Inc for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Applied DNA Sciences Inc (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Applied DNA Sciences Inc from 2001 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Applied DNA Sciences Inc worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43.8% | $1.94 Million | $4.44 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -26.4 pp |
| 2024 | 70.1% | $8.97 Million | $12.79 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +34.4 pp |
| 2023 | 35.7% | $4.87 Million | $13.65 Million | $8.78 Million | ▼ -22.3 pp |
| 2022 | 58.0% | $12.91 Million | $22.27 Million | $9.36 Million | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2021 | 77.1% | $11.11 Million | $14.42 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +26.7 pp |
| 2020 | 50.3% | $5.71 Million | $11.34 Million | $5.63 Million | ▲ +74.1 pp |
| 2019 | -23.8% | $-848.50K | $3.56 Million | $4.41 Million | ▼ -37.2 pp |
| 2018 | 13.4% | $754.50K | $5.63 Million | $4.88 Million | ▼ -70.7 pp |
| 2017 | 84.1% | $6.86 Million | $8.15 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2016 | 66.6% | $10.37 Million | $15.57 Million | $5.20 Million | ▼ -14.2 pp |
| 2015 | 80.8% | $12.57 Million | $15.55 Million | $2.99 Million | ▲ +122.7 pp |
| 2014 | -41.9% | $-1.47 Million | $3.51 Million | $4.97 Million | ▼ -97.0 pp |
| 2013 | 55.1% | $4.62 Million | $8.37 Million | $3.76 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 56.1% | $756.92K | $1.35 Million | $592.01K | ▲ +84.5 pp |
| 2011 | -28.4% | $-995.38K | $3.50 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +84.7 pp |
| 2010 | -113.1% | $-1.60 Million | $1.41 Million | $3.01 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2009 | -115.9% | $-1.75 Million | $1.51 Million | $3.25 Million | ▲ +644.2 pp |
| 2008 | -760.1% | $-14.04 Million | $1.85 Million | $15.88 Million | ▼ -264.8 pp |
| 2007 | -495.3% | $-11.94 Million | $2.41 Million | $14.36 Million | ▼ -290.3 pp |
| 2006 | -205.0% | $-9.59 Million | $4.68 Million | $14.26 Million | ▼ -276.7 pp |
| 2005 | 71.7% | $6.59 Million | $9.18 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +5836.2 pp |
| 2004 | -5764.5% | $-4.71 Million | $81.65K | $4.79 Million | ▼ -5486.0 pp |
| 2003 | -278.5% | $-577.43K | $207.36K | $784.79K | ▲ +334.9 pp |
| 2001 | -613.3% | $-828.00 | $135.00 | $963.00 | — |