Digital Turbine Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Digital Turbine Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Digital Turbine Inc (APPS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $17.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($652.90 Million) in one year. Check APPS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Digital Turbine Inc (2004–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Digital Turbine Inc from 2004 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Digital Turbine Inc across 23 annual periods. Check APPS cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Digital Turbine Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2004–2026)
Digital Turbine Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2004 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Digital Turbine Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see APPS cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.06x | $41.80 Million | $649.49 Million | ▲ +257.0% |
| 2025 | 0.02x | $11.88 Million | $658.90 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $11.88 Million | $651.61 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $28.68 Million | $659.30 Million | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $113.38 Million | $942.29 Million | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2021 | 0.54x | $62.80 Million | $115.26 Million | ▲ +85.0% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $31.38 Million | $106.56 Million | ▲ +979.1% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $1.27 Million | $46.50 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $6.97 Million | $58.94 Million | ▲ +180.8% |
| 2017 | -0.15x | $-6.66 Million | $45.53 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | $-7.07 Million | $39.67 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2015 | -0.47x | $-14.50 Million | $31.04 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2014 | -0.64x | $-7.81 Million | $12.14 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2013 | -0.58x | $-6.87 Million | $11.75 Million | ▼ -190.6% |
| 2012 | -0.20x | $-1.83 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2011 | -0.16x | $-1.91 Million | $11.59 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2010 | -0.09x | $-3.47 Million | $38.71 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-5.36 Million | $42.17 Million | ▼ -319.9% |
| 2008 | -0.03x | $-819.62K | $27.07 Million | ▲ +99.3% |
| 2007 | -4.24x | $-418.13K | $98.70K | ▼ -323.0% |
| 2006 | -1.00x | $-96.63K | $96.48K | ▼ -3144.3% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-171.00K | $5.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-171.00K | $5.54 Million | — |