Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd (APWC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd (APWC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.84 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($144.74 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd across 29 annual periods. Also explore APWC shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see APWC market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | $-7.75 Million | $144.74 Million | ▼ -127.4% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $24.30 Million | $124.50 Million | ▲ +587.3% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-6.09 Million | $152.04 Million | ▼ -197.4% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $6.57 Million | $159.59 Million | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2021 | -0.23x | $-41.61 Million | $180.11 Million | ▼ -245.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $16.38 Million | $103.24 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $15.14 Million | $70.48 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2018 | 0.48x | $40.65 Million | $83.98 Million | ▲ +420.8% |
| 2017 | -0.15x | $-16.90 Million | $112.02 Million | ▼ -261.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $9.01 Million | $96.42 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $9.20 Million | $111.33 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $8.14 Million | $157.46 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $20.61 Million | $136.51 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $11.65 Million | $154.77 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $22.62 Million | $122.60 Million | ▲ +1228.6% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | $-2.64 Million | $161.21 Million | ▼ -110.1% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $18.41 Million | $113.46 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $60.05 Million | $147.09 Million | ▲ +4000.3% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $1.91 Million | $191.44 Million | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-42.93 Million | $184.58 Million | ▼ -237.1% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $20.23 Million | $119.24 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $23.85 Million | $81.18 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $23.85 Million | $81.18 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $19.35 Million | $86.41 Million | ▲ +127.0% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $7.92 Million | $80.32 Million | ▲ +167.9% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-14.01 Million | $96.48 Million | ▼ -357.1% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $4.52 Million | $80.06 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $21.00 Million | $90.40 Million | ▲ +118.9% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $5.90 Million | $55.60 Million | — |