Alliance Resource Partners LP (ARLP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alliance Resource Partners LP (ARLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $153.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.16 Billion) in one year. See Alliance Resource Partners LP leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alliance Resource Partners LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alliance Resource Partners LP across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Alliance Resource Partners LP.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alliance Resource Partners LP (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alliance Resource Partners LP. Check ARLP operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.66x | $651.14 Million | $993.57 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2024 | 0.76x | $803.13 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2023 | 0.89x | $830.64 Million | $929.83 Million | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2022 | 0.78x | $791.81 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2021 | 0.46x | $425.20 Million | $933.34 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $400.64 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $514.89 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2018 | 0.58x | $696.82 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $567.58 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2016 | 0.64x | $703.54 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2015 | 0.52x | $716.34 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $739.20 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2013 | 0.55x | $704.65 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $555.86 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2011 | 0.52x | $573.98 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2010 | 0.50x | $520.59 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $282.74 Million | $730.42 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | $261.04 Million | $740.45 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2007 | 0.64x | $244.01 Million | $384.00 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2006 | 0.65x | $250.92 Million | $385.64 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $193.62 Million | $376.91 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $145.06 Million | $357.60 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $110.31 Million | $323.90 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $87.58 Million | $334.96 Million | ▲ +38.8% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $63.65 Million | $337.85 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $71.37 Million | $340.95 Million | ▲ +280.1% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $18.21 Million | $330.74 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 1998 | 0.47x | $50.50 Million | $108.30 Million | — |