Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.35x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-989.60K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.83 Million) in one year. Check ASTI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (2005–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. from 2005 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. across 21 annual periods. Also explore ASTI year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2005–2025)
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.31x | $-6.90 Million | $2.99 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2024 | -2.24x | $-8.42 Million | $3.77 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2023 | -1.13x | $-9.54 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-10.51 Million | $14.09 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2021 | -0.60x | $-9.40 Million | $15.68 Million | ▼ -473.7% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | $-2.88 Million | $27.56 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-2.72 Million | $30.74 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-4.02 Million | $28.93 Million | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2017 | -0.55x | $-12.60 Million | $22.98 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2016 | -0.66x | $-16.86 Million | $25.61 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2015 | -1.37x | $-22.10 Million | $16.17 Million | ▼ -134.8% |
| 2014 | -0.58x | $-28.09 Million | $48.26 Million | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2013 | -1.71x | $-20.35 Million | $11.88 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2012 | -1.90x | $-17.66 Million | $9.30 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2011 | -1.75x | $-19.93 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2010 | -1.60x | $-21.52 Million | $13.45 Million | ▼ -106.5% |
| 2009 | -0.77x | $-14.21 Million | $18.35 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2008 | -0.62x | $-9.08 Million | $14.59 Million | ▲ +82.7% |
| 2007 | -3.59x | $-4.29 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2006 | -7.10x | $-2.76 Million | $388.55K | ▼ -6646.7% |
| 2005 | -0.11x | $-42.65K | $405.46K | — |