Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.35x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-989.60K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.83 Million) in one year. See Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2005–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. across 21 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (2005–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.. Check how high is Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.31x | $-6.90 Million | $2.99 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2024 | -2.24x | $-8.42 Million | $3.77 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2023 | -1.13x | $-9.54 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-10.51 Million | $14.09 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2021 | -0.60x | $-9.40 Million | $15.68 Million | ▼ -473.7% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | $-2.88 Million | $27.56 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-2.72 Million | $30.74 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-4.02 Million | $28.93 Million | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2017 | -0.55x | $-12.60 Million | $22.98 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2016 | -0.66x | $-16.86 Million | $25.61 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2015 | -1.37x | $-22.10 Million | $16.17 Million | ▼ -134.8% |
| 2014 | -0.58x | $-28.09 Million | $48.26 Million | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2013 | -1.71x | $-20.35 Million | $11.88 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2012 | -1.90x | $-17.66 Million | $9.30 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2011 | -1.75x | $-19.93 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2010 | -1.60x | $-21.52 Million | $13.45 Million | ▼ -106.5% |
| 2009 | -0.77x | $-14.21 Million | $18.35 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2008 | -0.62x | $-9.08 Million | $14.59 Million | ▲ +82.7% |
| 2007 | -3.59x | $-4.29 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2006 | -7.10x | $-2.76 Million | $388.55K | ▼ -6646.7% |
| 2005 | -0.11x | $-42.65K | $405.46K | — |