Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.9% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($8.45K) from net assets ($15.27 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 13 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 99.9%, reflecting net assets of $15.27 Million with intangible assets of $8.45K USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see ASTI market cap.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. from 2006 to 2025, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. See ASTI financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.7% | $3.34 Million | $9.13K | $6.33 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 99.2% | $3.38 Million | $28.49K | $7.15 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2022 | 98.3% | $4.59 Million | $79.98K | $18.68 Million | ▲ +59.0 pp |
| 2015 | 39.2% | $2.58 Million | $1.57 Million | $18.75 Million | ▼ -43.8 pp |
| 2014 | 83.0% | $7.66 Million | $1.31 Million | $55.92 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2013 | 94.7% | $16.66 Million | $879.54K | $28.54 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2012 | 98.5% | $34.23 Million | $500.88K | $43.52 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 99.4% | $50.00 Million | $308.79K | $61.42 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 99.8% | $146.57 Million | $259.44K | $160.02 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 99.9% | $154.32 Million | $167.03K | $172.66 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 99.9% | $139.62 Million | $137.78K | $154.21 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 99.8% | $48.62 Million | $91.22K | $49.82 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 99.7% | $10.90 Million | $37.57K | $11.29 Million | — |