Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (AXDX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (AXDX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($84.60 Million) in one year. See Accelerate Diagnostics Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Accelerate Diagnostics Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Accelerate Diagnostics Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Accelerate Diagnostics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Accelerate Diagnostics Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.29x | $-24.19 Million | $84.60 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2023 | -0.78x | $-40.20 Million | $51.25 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2022 | -0.56x | $-48.73 Million | $87.28 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2021 | -0.40x | $-47.32 Million | $118.12 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-50.39 Million | $156.24 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2019 | -0.46x | $-64.79 Million | $141.80 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2018 | -0.53x | $-67.76 Million | $127.89 Million | ▲ +93.5% |
| 2017 | -8.19x | $-55.75 Million | $6.81 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2016 | -10.61x | $-53.41 Million | $5.04 Million | ▼ -90.4% |
| 2015 | -5.57x | $-35.13 Million | $6.31 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2014 | -4.93x | $-18.79 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2013 | -5.09x | $-9.75 Million | $1.91 Million | ▼ -1384.8% |
| 2012 | -0.34x | $-816.00K | $2.38 Million | ▼ -210.8% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | $448.48K | $1.45 Million | ▲ +153.3% |
| 2010 | -0.58x | $-789.60K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -244.2% |
| 2009 | -0.17x | $-225.66K | $1.34 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2008 | -0.68x | $-963.73K | $1.41 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2007 | -1.22x | $-1.54 Million | $1.26 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2006 | -2.38x | $-2.64 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -99.5% |
| 2005 | -1.19x | $-1.60 Million | $1.34 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2004 | -1.23x | $-1.22 Million | $988.09K | ▼ -926.9% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $151.16K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +128.6% |
| 2002 | -0.52x | $-665.16K | $1.28 Million | ▼ -814.0% |
| 2001 | -0.06x | $-63.73K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -125.5% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $410.61K | $1.84 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 1999 | 0.57x | $1.04 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 1998 | 2.26x | $3.66 Million | $1.62 Million | ▲ +50.8% |
| 1997 | 1.50x | $900.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1996 | 2.75x | $1.10 Million | $400.00K | — |