Accelerate Diagnostics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (AXDX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($84.60 Million) in one year. Check Accelerate Diagnostics Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Accelerate Diagnostics Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Accelerate Diagnostics Inc across 29 annual periods. Check AXDX cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Accelerate Diagnostics Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Accelerate Diagnostics Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.29x | $-24.19 Million | $84.60 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2023 | -0.78x | $-40.20 Million | $51.25 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2022 | -0.56x | $-48.73 Million | $87.28 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2021 | -0.40x | $-47.32 Million | $118.12 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-50.39 Million | $156.24 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2019 | -0.46x | $-64.79 Million | $141.80 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2018 | -0.53x | $-67.76 Million | $127.89 Million | ▲ +93.5% |
| 2017 | -8.19x | $-55.75 Million | $6.81 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2016 | -10.61x | $-53.41 Million | $5.04 Million | ▼ -90.4% |
| 2015 | -5.57x | $-35.13 Million | $6.31 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2014 | -4.93x | $-18.79 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2013 | -5.09x | $-9.75 Million | $1.91 Million | ▼ -1384.8% |
| 2012 | -0.34x | $-816.00K | $2.38 Million | ▼ -210.8% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | $448.48K | $1.45 Million | ▲ +153.3% |
| 2010 | -0.58x | $-789.60K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -244.2% |
| 2009 | -0.17x | $-225.66K | $1.34 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2008 | -0.68x | $-963.73K | $1.41 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2007 | -1.22x | $-1.54 Million | $1.26 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2006 | -2.38x | $-2.64 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -99.5% |
| 2005 | -1.19x | $-1.60 Million | $1.34 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2004 | -1.23x | $-1.22 Million | $988.09K | ▼ -926.9% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $151.16K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +128.6% |
| 2002 | -0.52x | $-665.16K | $1.28 Million | ▼ -814.0% |
| 2001 | -0.06x | $-63.73K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -125.5% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $410.61K | $1.84 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 1999 | 0.57x | $1.04 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 1998 | 2.26x | $3.66 Million | $1.62 Million | ▲ +50.8% |
| 1997 | 1.50x | $900.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1996 | 2.75x | $1.10 Million | $400.00K | — |