Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (AXDX) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (AXDX) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of September 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($10.22 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See net assets of Accelerate Diagnostics Inc for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2018)
This chart shows how Accelerate Diagnostics Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 23 annual periods from 1996 to 2018. As of September 2019, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $10.22 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. Also explore net asset momentum of Accelerate Diagnostics Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (1996–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Accelerate Diagnostics Inc from 1996 to 2018, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (AXDX) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 99.8% | $57.38 Million | $114.00K | $185.26 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2017 | 99.9% | $119.92 Million | $134.00K | $126.73 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 99.8% | $77.82 Million | $146.00K | $82.85 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 99.9% | $133.02 Million | $157.00K | $139.32 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 99.7% | $65.99 Million | $167.00K | $69.80 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2013 | 99.4% | $41.52 Million | $240.67K | $43.43 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2012 | 95.4% | $14.84 Million | $680.94K | $17.21 Million | ▲ +53.3 pp |
| 2011 | 42.1% | $4.82 Million | $2.79 Million | $6.26 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2010 | 39.6% | $4.91 Million | $2.97 Million | $6.27 Million | ▲ +20.9 pp |
| 2009 | 18.6% | $3.89 Million | $3.17 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2008 | 24.2% | $4.41 Million | $3.35 Million | $5.83 Million | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2007 | 28.9% | $4.88 Million | $3.47 Million | $6.14 Million | ▼ -16.1 pp |
| 2006 | 44.9% | $6.74 Million | $3.71 Million | $7.85 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2005 | 59.9% | $9.67 Million | $3.88 Million | $11.01 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2004 | 65.3% | $11.74 Million | $4.07 Million | $12.72 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2003 | 66.6% | $12.73 Million | $4.26 Million | $13.75 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2002 | 66.4% | $13.74 Million | $4.62 Million | $15.02 Million | ▼ -28.6 pp |
| 2001 | 95.0% | $9.61 Million | $485.00K | $10.73 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $11.26 Million | $0.00 | $13.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $12.24 Million | $0.00 | $14.07 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $12.36 Million | $0.00 | $13.97 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $9.20 Million | $0.00 | $9.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $1.90 Million | $0.00 | $2.30 Million | — |