Azenta Inc (AZTA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Azenta Inc (AZTA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($349.21 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Azenta Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Azenta Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Azenta Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore Azenta Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Azenta Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Azenta Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AZTA market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $72.18 Million | $330.70 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $49.74 Million | $331.07 Million | ▲ +804.5% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $5.83 Million | $351.22 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2022 | -1.32x | $-466.05 Million | $352.74 Million | ▼ -535.7% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $149.86 Million | $494.18 Million | ▲ +176.7% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $37.87 Million | $345.51 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $90.90 Million | $377.76 Million | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $73.96 Million | $378.18 Million | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2017 | 0.61x | $96.22 Million | $158.98 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $39.55 Million | $132.22 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $43.73 Million | $127.61 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $53.78 Million | $135.15 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2013 | 0.52x | $54.39 Million | $104.11 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $36.04 Million | $92.66 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2011 | 0.74x | $87.65 Million | $118.02 Million | ▲ +243.4% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $27.87 Million | $128.87 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2009 | -0.60x | $-56.49 Million | $93.70 Million | ▼ -635.3% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $13.66 Million | $121.23 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $72.87 Million | $154.60 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $65.19 Million | $193.05 Million | ▲ +239.9% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $31.11 Million | $313.19 Million | ▲ +300.8% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $8.86 Million | $357.23 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-48.33 Million | $329.71 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-55.66 Million | $348.77 Million | ▼ -315.2% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $20.68 Million | $278.90 Million | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2000 | -0.13x | $-13.18 Million | $98.09 Million | ▼ -181.8% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $5.50 Million | $33.50 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $1.80 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +172.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | $-2.00 Million | $15.50 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-2.10 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 1995 | -0.72x | $-7.20 Million | $10.00 Million | ▼ -1892.0% |
| 1994 | -0.04x | $-300.00K | $8.30 Million | — |