Azenta Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Azenta Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Azenta Inc (AZTA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($366.08 Million) in one year. Check AZTA cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Azenta Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Azenta Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Azenta Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Azenta Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Azenta Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Azenta Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Azenta Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Azenta Inc (AZTA) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $72.18 Million | $330.70 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $49.74 Million | $331.07 Million | ▲ +804.5% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $5.83 Million | $351.22 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2022 | -1.32x | $-466.05 Million | $352.74 Million | ▼ -535.7% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $149.86 Million | $494.18 Million | ▲ +176.7% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $37.87 Million | $345.51 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $90.90 Million | $377.76 Million | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $73.96 Million | $378.18 Million | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2017 | 0.61x | $96.22 Million | $158.98 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $39.55 Million | $132.22 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $43.73 Million | $127.61 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $53.78 Million | $135.15 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2013 | 0.52x | $54.39 Million | $104.11 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $36.04 Million | $92.66 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2011 | 0.74x | $87.65 Million | $118.02 Million | ▲ +243.4% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $27.87 Million | $128.87 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2009 | -0.60x | $-56.49 Million | $93.70 Million | ▼ -635.3% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $13.66 Million | $121.23 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $72.87 Million | $154.60 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $65.19 Million | $193.05 Million | ▲ +239.9% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $31.11 Million | $313.19 Million | ▲ +300.8% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $8.86 Million | $357.23 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-48.33 Million | $329.71 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-55.66 Million | $348.77 Million | ▼ -315.2% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $20.68 Million | $278.90 Million | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2000 | -0.13x | $-13.18 Million | $98.09 Million | ▼ -181.8% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $5.50 Million | $33.50 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $1.80 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +172.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | $-2.00 Million | $15.50 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-2.10 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 1995 | -0.72x | $-7.20 Million | $10.00 Million | ▼ -1892.0% |
| 1994 | -0.04x | $-300.00K | $8.30 Million | — |