Azenta Inc (AZTA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Azenta Inc (AZTA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($349.21 Million) in one year. See AZTA FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Azenta Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Azenta Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore Azenta Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Azenta Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Azenta Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Azenta Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $72.18 Million | $330.70 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $49.74 Million | $331.07 Million | ▲ +804.5% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $5.83 Million | $351.22 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2022 | -1.32x | $-466.05 Million | $352.74 Million | ▼ -535.7% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $149.86 Million | $494.18 Million | ▲ +176.7% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $37.87 Million | $345.51 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $90.90 Million | $377.76 Million | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $73.96 Million | $378.18 Million | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2017 | 0.61x | $96.22 Million | $158.98 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $39.55 Million | $132.22 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $43.73 Million | $127.61 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $53.78 Million | $135.15 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2013 | 0.52x | $54.39 Million | $104.11 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $36.04 Million | $92.66 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2011 | 0.74x | $87.65 Million | $118.02 Million | ▲ +243.4% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $27.87 Million | $128.87 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2009 | -0.60x | $-56.49 Million | $93.70 Million | ▼ -635.3% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $13.66 Million | $121.23 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $72.87 Million | $154.60 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $65.19 Million | $193.05 Million | ▲ +239.9% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $31.11 Million | $313.19 Million | ▲ +300.8% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $8.86 Million | $357.23 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-48.33 Million | $329.71 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-55.66 Million | $348.77 Million | ▼ -315.2% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $20.68 Million | $278.90 Million | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2000 | -0.13x | $-13.18 Million | $98.09 Million | ▼ -181.8% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $5.50 Million | $33.50 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $1.80 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +172.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | $-2.00 Million | $15.50 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-2.10 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 1995 | -0.72x | $-7.20 Million | $10.00 Million | ▼ -1892.0% |
| 1994 | -0.04x | $-300.00K | $8.30 Million | — |