Biocardia Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Biocardia Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Biocardia Inc (BCDA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.84x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.74 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.06 Million) in one year. Check Biocardia Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Biocardia Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Biocardia Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Biocardia Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Biocardia Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Biocardia Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Biocardia Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Biocardia Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Biocardia Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.95x | $-7.44 Million | $2.52 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2024 | -2.78x | $-8.03 Million | $2.89 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2023 | -2.17x | $-9.97 Million | $4.59 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2022 | -2.15x | $-10.56 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2021 | -1.94x | $-10.37 Million | $5.34 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2020 | -2.91x | $-12.36 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2019 | -1.78x | $-9.45 Million | $5.31 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2018 | -4.22x | $-11.07 Million | $2.62 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2017 | -3.59x | $-8.67 Million | $2.41 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2016 | -3.68x | $-5.52 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -111.1% |
| 2015 | 33.10x | $331.00K | $10.00K | ▼ -84.5% |
| 2014 | 214.00x | $214.00K | $1.00K | ▲ +14166.7% |
| 2013 | 1.50x | $27.00K | $18.00K | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2012 | -25.83x | $-310.00K | $12.00K | ▼ -532.7% |
| 2011 | -4.08x | $-3.09 Million | $756.00K | ▼ -105.8% |
| 2010 | -1.98x | $-4.28 Million | $2.16 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2009 | -5.62x | $-4.78 Million | $851.00K | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2008 | -3.47x | $-2.70 Million | $777.00K | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2007 | -1.82x | $-47.12K | $25.83K | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2006 | -22.22x | $-741.46K | $33.37K | ▼ -3412.7% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-455.82K | $720.54K | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2004 | -1.01x | $-749.42K | $742.45K | ▼ -226.7% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | $-297.66K | $963.32K | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2002 | -0.57x | $-491.22K | $868.49K | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2001 | -1.96x | $-1.53 Million | $782.74K | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2000 | -1.19x | $-1.38 Million | $1.16 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-1.00 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1998 | -1.00x | $-700.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1997 | -0.83x | $-500.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.83x | $-500.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -419.8% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $263.39K | $1.01 Million | — |