Biocardia Inc (BCDA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Biocardia Inc (BCDA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.99x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.50 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.52 Million) in one year. See BCDA free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Biocardia Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Biocardia Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Biocardia Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Biocardia Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Biocardia Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Biocardia Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.95x | $-7.44 Million | $2.52 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2024 | -2.78x | $-8.03 Million | $2.89 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2023 | -2.17x | $-9.97 Million | $4.59 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2022 | -2.15x | $-10.56 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2021 | -1.94x | $-10.37 Million | $5.34 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2020 | -2.91x | $-12.36 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2019 | -1.78x | $-9.45 Million | $5.31 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2018 | -4.22x | $-11.07 Million | $2.62 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2017 | -3.59x | $-8.67 Million | $2.41 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2016 | -3.68x | $-5.52 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -111.1% |
| 2015 | 33.10x | $331.00K | $10.00K | ▼ -84.5% |
| 2014 | 214.00x | $214.00K | $1.00K | ▲ +14166.7% |
| 2013 | 1.50x | $27.00K | $18.00K | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2012 | -25.83x | $-310.00K | $12.00K | ▼ -532.7% |
| 2011 | -4.08x | $-3.09 Million | $756.00K | ▼ -105.8% |
| 2010 | -1.98x | $-4.28 Million | $2.16 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2009 | -5.62x | $-4.78 Million | $851.00K | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2008 | -3.47x | $-2.70 Million | $777.00K | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2007 | -1.82x | $-47.12K | $25.83K | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2006 | -22.22x | $-741.46K | $33.37K | ▼ -3412.7% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-455.82K | $720.54K | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2004 | -1.01x | $-749.42K | $742.45K | ▼ -226.7% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | $-297.66K | $963.32K | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2002 | -0.57x | $-491.22K | $868.49K | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2001 | -1.96x | $-1.53 Million | $782.74K | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2000 | -1.19x | $-1.38 Million | $1.16 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-1.00 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1998 | -1.00x | $-700.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1997 | -0.83x | $-500.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.83x | $-500.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -419.8% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $263.39K | $1.01 Million | — |