BioLife Solutions Inc (BLFS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BioLife Solutions Inc (BLFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.00 Million) in one year. See BioLife Solutions Inc (BLFS) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BioLife Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BioLife Solutions Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore BLFS net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BioLife Solutions Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BioLife Solutions Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is BioLife Solutions Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.59x | $20.11 Million | $34.00 Million | ▲ +255.0% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $8.43 Million | $50.58 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | $-12.50 Million | $75.05 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-8.49 Million | $86.04 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-4.84 Million | $76.24 Million | ▼ -128.8% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $6.51 Million | $29.58 Million | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $1.21 Million | $9.98 Million | ▼ -88.0% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $2.35 Million | $2.32 Million | ▲ +243.2% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $605.00K | $2.05 Million | ▲ +132.5% |
| 2016 | -0.91x | $-4.33 Million | $4.76 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2015 | -1.98x | $-4.97 Million | $2.51 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2014 | -1.48x | $-3.16 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -16952.6% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $146.01K | $16.62 Million | ▼ -83.9% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $854.93K | $15.66 Million | ▲ +170.8% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-989.92K | $12.84 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-1.25 Million | $10.86 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2009 | -0.26x | $-2.41 Million | $9.16 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-2.11 Million | $6.34 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2007 | -0.85x | $-2.71 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2006 | -1.87x | $-712.20K | $380.34K | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2005 | -1.41x | $-576.33K | $408.62K | ▼ -160.3% |
| 2004 | 2.34x | $515.10K | $220.31K | ▲ +540.1% |
| 2003 | -0.53x | $-854.23K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 2002 | -3.08x | $-2.68 Million | $868.10K | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2001 | -1.80x | $-2.64 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2000 | -8.05x | $-2.90 Million | $360.26K | ▼ -3951.4% |
| 1999 | -0.20x | $-266.26K | $1.34 Million | ▼ -983.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $29.12K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 1997 | -1.05x | $-1.49 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 1996 | -1.01x | $-2.07 Million | $2.05 Million | ▼ -189.8% |
| 1995 | -0.35x | $-1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.35x | $-1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 1993 | -0.68x | $-2.60 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +77.2% |
| 1992 | -3.00x | $-8.40 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1991 | -4.30x | $-4.30 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 1990 | -25.00x | $-2.50 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -284.6% |
| 1989 | -6.50x | $-1.30 Million | $200.00K | — |