BioLife Solutions Inc (BLFS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BioLife Solutions Inc (BLFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.35 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.49 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is BioLife Solutions Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BioLife Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BioLife Solutions Inc across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of BioLife Solutions Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BioLife Solutions Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BioLife Solutions Inc. Check BLFS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.59x | $20.11 Million | $34.00 Million | ▲ +255.0% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $8.43 Million | $50.58 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | $-12.50 Million | $75.05 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-8.49 Million | $86.04 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-4.84 Million | $76.24 Million | ▼ -128.8% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $6.51 Million | $29.58 Million | ▲ +796.2% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $1.21 Million | $49.36 Million | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $2.35 Million | $30.84 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $605.00K | $2.05 Million | ▲ +132.5% |
| 2016 | -0.91x | $-4.33 Million | $4.76 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2015 | -1.98x | $-4.97 Million | $2.51 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2014 | -1.48x | $-3.16 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -16952.6% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $146.01K | $16.62 Million | ▼ -83.9% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $854.93K | $15.66 Million | ▲ +170.8% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-989.92K | $12.84 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-1.25 Million | $10.86 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2009 | -0.26x | $-2.41 Million | $9.16 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-2.11 Million | $6.34 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2007 | -0.85x | $-2.71 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2006 | -1.87x | $-712.20K | $380.34K | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2005 | -1.41x | $-576.33K | $408.62K | ▼ -160.3% |
| 2004 | 2.34x | $515.10K | $220.31K | ▲ +540.1% |
| 2003 | -0.53x | $-854.23K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 2002 | -3.08x | $-2.68 Million | $868.10K | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2001 | -1.80x | $-2.64 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2000 | -8.05x | $-2.90 Million | $360.26K | ▼ -3951.4% |
| 1999 | -0.20x | $-266.26K | $1.34 Million | ▼ -983.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $29.12K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 1997 | -1.05x | $-1.49 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 1996 | -1.01x | $-2.07 Million | $2.05 Million | ▼ -189.8% |
| 1995 | -0.35x | $-1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.35x | $-1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 1993 | -0.68x | $-2.60 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +77.2% |
| 1992 | -3.00x | $-8.40 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 1991 | -3.58x | $-4.30 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1990 | -25.00x | $-2.50 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -284.6% |
| 1989 | -6.50x | $-1.30 Million | $200.00K | — |