BioLife Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BioLife Solutions Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. BioLife Solutions Inc (BLFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.35 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.49 Million) in one year. Check how high is BioLife Solutions Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of BioLife Solutions Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of BioLife Solutions Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for BioLife Solutions Inc across 37 annual periods. Check BLFS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
BioLife Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
BioLife Solutions Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BioLife Solutions Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of BioLife Solutions Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.59x | $20.11 Million | $34.00 Million | ▲ +255.0% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $8.43 Million | $50.58 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | $-12.50 Million | $75.05 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-8.49 Million | $86.04 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-4.84 Million | $76.24 Million | ▼ -128.8% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $6.51 Million | $29.58 Million | ▲ +796.2% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $1.21 Million | $49.36 Million | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $2.35 Million | $30.84 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $605.00K | $2.05 Million | ▲ +132.5% |
| 2016 | -0.91x | $-4.33 Million | $4.76 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2015 | -1.98x | $-4.97 Million | $2.51 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2014 | -1.48x | $-3.16 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -16952.6% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $146.01K | $16.62 Million | ▼ -83.9% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $854.93K | $15.66 Million | ▲ +170.8% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-989.92K | $12.84 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-1.25 Million | $10.86 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2009 | -0.26x | $-2.41 Million | $9.16 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-2.11 Million | $6.34 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2007 | -0.85x | $-2.71 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2006 | -1.87x | $-712.20K | $380.34K | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2005 | -1.41x | $-576.33K | $408.62K | ▼ -160.3% |
| 2004 | 2.34x | $515.10K | $220.31K | ▲ +540.1% |
| 2003 | -0.53x | $-854.23K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 2002 | -3.08x | $-2.68 Million | $868.10K | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2001 | -1.80x | $-2.64 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2000 | -8.05x | $-2.90 Million | $360.26K | ▼ -3951.4% |
| 1999 | -0.20x | $-266.26K | $1.34 Million | ▼ -983.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $29.12K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 1997 | -1.05x | $-1.49 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 1996 | -1.01x | $-2.07 Million | $2.05 Million | ▼ -189.8% |
| 1995 | -0.35x | $-1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.35x | $-1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 1993 | -0.68x | $-2.60 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +77.2% |
| 1992 | -3.00x | $-8.40 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 1991 | -3.58x | $-4.30 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1990 | -25.00x | $-2.50 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -284.6% |
| 1989 | -6.50x | $-1.30 Million | $200.00K | — |