BOS Better Online Solutions (BOSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BOS Better Online Solutions (BOSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.32x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.94 Million) in one year. See BOSC free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BOS Better Online Solutions Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BOS Better Online Solutions across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BOSC cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BOS Better Online Solutions (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BOS Better Online Solutions. Check how high is BOS Better Online Solutions's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.32x | $5.05 Million | $15.94 Million | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $1.29 Million | $13.01 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.83 Million | $13.64 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $1.28 Million | $13.96 Million | ▲ +10529.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $9.00K | $10.41 Million | ▼ -99.1% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $1.06 Million | $11.16 Million | ▲ +231.0% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-915.00K | $12.64 Million | ▼ -183.8% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $743.00K | $8.60 Million | ▲ +172.3% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $355.00K | $11.19 Million | ▲ +184.0% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-361.00K | $9.56 Million | ▼ -205.3% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $370.00K | $10.32 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $1.08 Million | $10.96 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $1.05 Million | $15.48 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.71 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +617.8% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-365.00K | $16.47 Million | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $1.28 Million | $18.42 Million | ▲ +233.2% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | $-1.27 Million | $24.26 Million | ▼ -428.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $416.00K | $26.10 Million | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | $-4.59 Million | $16.69 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2006 | -0.19x | $-2.29 Million | $12.18 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2005 | -0.34x | $-3.90 Million | $11.38 Million | ▼ -278.5% |
| 2004 | -0.09x | $-1.05 Million | $11.63 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 2003 | -0.85x | $-2.97 Million | $3.48 Million | ▼ -528.1% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $1.57 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +235.6% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $848.00K | $14.29 Million | ▲ +161.7% |
| 2000 | -0.10x | $-1.56 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +62.6% |
| 1999 | -0.26x | $-5.02 Million | $19.48 Million | ▼ -56.1% |
| 1998 | -0.16x | $-1.60 Million | $9.70 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | $-500.00K | $2.40 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 1996 | -0.94x | $-1.70 Million | $1.80 Million | — |