BOS Better Online Solutions Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BOS Better Online Solutions cash flow-to-debt ratio. BOS Better Online Solutions (BOSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.32x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.94 Million) in one year. Check BOSC cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of BOS Better Online Solutions (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of BOS Better Online Solutions from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for BOS Better Online Solutions across 30 annual periods. Check how aggressively does BOS Better Online Solutions reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
BOS Better Online Solutions Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
BOS Better Online Solutions cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BOS Better Online Solutions. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BOS Better Online Solutions cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.32x | $5.05 Million | $15.94 Million | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $1.29 Million | $13.01 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.83 Million | $13.64 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $1.28 Million | $13.96 Million | ▲ +10529.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $9.00K | $10.41 Million | ▼ -99.1% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $1.06 Million | $11.16 Million | ▲ +231.0% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-915.00K | $12.64 Million | ▼ -183.8% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $743.00K | $8.60 Million | ▲ +172.3% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $355.00K | $11.19 Million | ▲ +184.0% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-361.00K | $9.56 Million | ▼ -205.3% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $370.00K | $10.32 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $1.08 Million | $10.96 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $1.05 Million | $15.48 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.71 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +617.8% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-365.00K | $16.47 Million | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $1.28 Million | $18.42 Million | ▲ +233.2% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | $-1.27 Million | $24.26 Million | ▼ -428.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $416.00K | $26.10 Million | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | $-4.59 Million | $16.69 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2006 | -0.19x | $-2.29 Million | $12.18 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2005 | -0.34x | $-3.90 Million | $11.38 Million | ▼ -278.5% |
| 2004 | -0.09x | $-1.05 Million | $11.63 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 2003 | -0.85x | $-2.97 Million | $3.48 Million | ▼ -528.1% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $1.57 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +235.6% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $848.00K | $14.29 Million | ▲ +161.7% |
| 2000 | -0.10x | $-1.56 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +62.6% |
| 1999 | -0.26x | $-5.02 Million | $19.48 Million | ▼ -56.1% |
| 1998 | -0.16x | $-1.60 Million | $9.70 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | $-500.00K | $2.40 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 1996 | -0.94x | $-1.70 Million | $1.80 Million | — |